BC 2012 01 03 Work Session - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

January 3, 2012 (Work Session) Seat Distribution Summary - (Based on July 2011 Capital Improvements Plan) Page 923 Elementary - The CIP does not include proposed improvements that would create additional capacity for the school impacted by this project. Middle - The CIP does not include proposed improvements that would create additional capacity for the school impacted by this project. High - The CIP does not include proposed improvements that would create additional capacity for the school impacted by this project. The following table indicates available and planned school capacity, based on the standards for review established in Chapter 15 of the Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance. Adequacy Determination As illustrated above, adequate school capacity at the elementary and middle school does not exist currently for this apartment project, nor does it exist at the two year and five year review levels. (Note that according to Section 15 -9, Number 4, of the APFO, "...future available capacity must be "...equal to or greater than the projected enrollment that will be produced by the proposed development for all school types," not just one or two.) Is the project subject to Chapter 15, Adequate Public Facilities? Yes. Board of Commissioner Action Options: Option #1 Consider approval of the Reservation of Capacity with the conditions outlined below: 1. The project is subject to a phasing schedule. In calendar year 2011, no more than 2 multi- family apartment unit permits issued; In calendar year 2012, no more than 20 multi - family apartment unit permits issued; In calendar year 2013, no more than 20 multi - family apartment unit permits issued; In calendar year 2014, no more than 20 multi - family apartment unit permits issued; In calendar year 2015, no more than 20 multi - family apartment unit permits issued; In calendar year 2016, no more than 332 multi - family apartment unit permits issued. 2. Mitigation of the pro -rata share of the cost of the planned capacity, which equals $3,678.00 per multi - family residential apartment unit, payable prior to building permitting. Option #2 Consider approval of the Reservation of Capacity with the phasing schedule and mitigation payment timing proposed by the applicant. 1. Applicant proposed phasing schedule. In calendar year 2012, no more than 216 multi- family apartment unit permits issued; Current Available Available Available Capacity Capacity Capacity Including Including Including Students Students Students Current Generated Planned Generated Planned Generated Available by Capacity by Capacity by School Capacity Pro 2 Yrs Project 5 Yrs Project C. E. Boger -258 -320 -258 -320 -258 -320 Elementary Northwest Middle -225 -248 -225 -248 -225 -248 School Northwest High 198 168 198 168 198 168 School Adequacy Determination As illustrated above, adequate school capacity at the elementary and middle school does not exist currently for this apartment project, nor does it exist at the two year and five year review levels. (Note that according to Section 15 -9, Number 4, of the APFO, "...future available capacity must be "...equal to or greater than the projected enrollment that will be produced by the proposed development for all school types," not just one or two.) Is the project subject to Chapter 15, Adequate Public Facilities? Yes. Board of Commissioner Action Options: Option #1 Consider approval of the Reservation of Capacity with the conditions outlined below: 1. The project is subject to a phasing schedule. In calendar year 2011, no more than 2 multi- family apartment unit permits issued; In calendar year 2012, no more than 20 multi - family apartment unit permits issued; In calendar year 2013, no more than 20 multi - family apartment unit permits issued; In calendar year 2014, no more than 20 multi - family apartment unit permits issued; In calendar year 2015, no more than 20 multi - family apartment unit permits issued; In calendar year 2016, no more than 332 multi - family apartment unit permits issued. 2. Mitigation of the pro -rata share of the cost of the planned capacity, which equals $3,678.00 per multi - family residential apartment unit, payable prior to building permitting. Option #2 Consider approval of the Reservation of Capacity with the phasing schedule and mitigation payment timing proposed by the applicant. 1. Applicant proposed phasing schedule. In calendar year 2012, no more than 216 multi- family apartment unit permits issued;