Laserfiche WebLink
June 1, 2011 (Recessed Meeting) Page 452 <br />that this small amount could be absorbed easily, since revenues always exceed <br />expenditures. <br />Mrs. Porter expressed appreciation for the funding. <br />Recess of Meeting <br />The Board took a short break at 4:32 p.m. The meeting resumed at 4:53 <br />p.m. <br />Discussion - Cabarrus Health Alliance <br />John Day, County Manager, reviewed data that identified which programs <br />provided by the Health Alliance are mandated or non - mandated and utilize <br />county funding. He noted that in the past, county funding was used to cover <br />shortfalls in program revenue without input or direction from the Board of <br />Commissioners. To ensure that mandated programs are provided at a sufficient <br />level of service and particular programs of interest to the Board of <br />Commissions are funded, a new contract was prepared in conjunction with the <br />program data. He advised that the new contract allows the Commission to <br />designate the funding to specific programs or leave it open ended as has been <br />done in the past. A lengthy discussion ensued. The following issues or <br />concerns were addressed: the importance of continuing the school nurse <br />program and the origin and history of its funding mechanisms, lack of <br />financial support from the local hospital which is extremely profitable, <br />funding for the Health Alliance is based on an arbitrary per capita basis, <br />asking the General Assembly to examine health rules and take legislative <br />action to give the Health Alliance freedom to charge a reasonable fee for <br />health services supported by local government, consolidated services, <br />statutory responsibilities of the Commission, etc. Mr. Day also responded to <br />a variety of questions from the Board. <br />Board members were polled and there was a consensus to specify the <br />funding. After further discussion, the Board agreed to discuss the matter <br />again at its June 6 th work session. (Note: Commissioner Carruth was not <br />available to participate in the consensus due to technical issues.) <br />Fee for Tax Collections on Behalf of Municipalities and Fire Districts <br />John Day, County Manager, presented the following information related <br />to fees for tax collection: <br />Current rate: 1.50 of taxes collected <br />Proposed: For municipalities - a formula based on the cost of collections and the <br />proportion of tax bills, as follows: <br />number of municipal tax bills X 500- of the cost of collections <br />number of total tax bills <br />Where the cost of collections equals the direct cost of the tax collection, division <br />plus 10% for overhead ($870,348 X 1.10 = $957,383). <br />Using Kannapolis as an example: <br />49,912 Kannapolis tax bills = .2023 $957,382 (tax collections cost) = $478,691 <br />246,683 Total tax bills .5 <br />.2023 X $478,691 = $96,839 (collection fee) <br />For fire districts - no change from current fee. <br />Mr. Day also reported the City of Kannapolis notified the County that <br />they were going to do their own tax collection without giving the County an <br />opportunity to weigh -in on the matter. After receiving complaints from <br />citizens, he said the methodology was revisited and the aforementioned <br />collection formula was reached as a compromise. He further reported the <br />$96,839.00 will be additional revenue for the County since the original <br />collection amount was removed from the budget, and it reduces the amount of <br />loss the County would have incurred otherwise. <br />By consensus, the Board approved the new fee for tax collections on <br />behalf of municipalities as set forth above. (Note: Commissioner Carruth <br />was not available to participate due to technical issues.) <br />FY 2011 -12 Budget Changes <br />Pam Dubois, Deputy County Manager, reviewed the proposed changes to the <br />FY 11 -12 budget as follows: <br />