My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2011 06 20 Regular
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2011
>
BC 2011 06 20 Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2011 4:05:01 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:00:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
6/20/2011
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 20, 2011 (Regular Meeting) <br />Page 509 <br />We do know that you are challenged by many issues on a regular <br />basis which require you to make some very difficult decisions and <br />in some cases decisions which may not be most popular. You are <br />to be commended for the work you do regardless of the outcome of <br />those decisions. <br />I would like to now address one of those issues, that being the <br />upcoming 2012 five year projected budget. I have had the distinct <br />pleasure of attending all of your budget workshops and seeing <br />this board in action. I must say that it has been one of the <br />most educational endeavors I have undertaken in quite some time. <br />While I will be the first to admit that this board has worked <br />hard to hold down the cost of governing Cabarrus County, I would <br />respectfully challenge you to do more. The citizens of this <br />county are having to make some hard financial decisions this year <br />and in many cases have had to do so for the last several years. <br />We are faced with reducing our expenses at every turn and many <br />have lost their jobs and their ability to provide for their <br />families entirely. <br />We The People now call upon those in the "Public Sector" to do <br />the same. I'll be the first to say that we must protect the jobs <br />of our teachers, firefighters and law enforcement officers every <br />way we possibly can. I will be the last to ask for any of their <br />jobs to be eliminated as a way to reduce spending. Unfortunately <br />reduction of spending is what must be done because of the hard <br />economic times we all face. <br />Please hear me clearly, I do not encourage the loss of any of <br />their jobs. Having seen what goes on in your budget workshops I <br />would call upon you to consider the following three challenges: <br />1) Freeze all county spending at the 2010 budget level for the <br />next 5 years. You know what revenues you had to work with and <br />will not be working on a guestimate or projections of what might <br />be coming in. <br />2) Challenge every department head to reduce their departments <br />spending by loo every year for the next 5 years starting <br />immediately. Please don't tell me that cannot be done. It comes <br />down to the difference of not wanting to verses not having to. <br />We are currently faced with the fact that we must reduce our <br />spending and it must be done now. Any department head worth what <br />we are paying them should be capable of a 10° departmental cost <br />reduction or we seriously need to consider someone else to run <br />that department. <br />3) Seriously consider privatizing as many functions of our <br />current system as possible. If there are companies listed in the <br />phone book who can perform any of the functions any department or <br />any persons in a department are currently doing then I encourage <br />you to put out a request for qualifications and /or request for <br />bids to determine if those functions can be done more <br />economically by businesses in the private sector. <br />On behalf of the more than 1,000 citizens who are a part of We <br />The People NC and those who closely identify with our goals and <br />ideals of less expensive government and lower taxes, we would <br />like to thank you for your hard work and considerations of our <br />ideas for reducing spending, preventing any additional taxation <br />and the need to raise property tax rates as proposed in your <br />projected budgets. <br />Bob Scaggs, resident of 5499 Camlan Court in Harrisburg, read the <br />following statement: <br />I am here this evening representing the residents of Harrisburg. <br />I am here to convey my deep concern regarding several items. <br />The first of these items that concerns me deeply is the support <br />of this board in honoring the agreement with the Town of <br />Harrisburg to keep the Fire Tax rates equal for the districts <br />served and not have the municipal residents subsidizing the <br />county residents specifically the Harrisburg Fire district within <br />the County but outside of the City limits of Harrisburg. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.