Laserfiche WebLink
July 5, 2011 (Work Session) Page 530 <br />Program <br />No. of <br />Meal <br />2919 2919 M10 1010 MIT 2011 <br />Lease <br />Meals <br />Price <br />Frequency <br />Amount <br />Anson Meals on <br />170 <br />$3.96 <br />Lunch - 5 days /week <br />C REATE T-T FItJ_ <br />Wheels <br />CREATEREVALNLE <br />T90p <br />FRICEOUTSLUY' WIFFATURE`J <br />31 -D.0 <br />I.MPr <br />MAIL MCOME GUEST ONNARES <br />$6,000.00 <br />Cab. LunchPlus <br />270 <br />$4.65 <br />Lunch - 5 days /week /5 sites <br />CAP RATE Oa1alOPmtln1 <br />Club <br />31JIII <br />O EVELOP PRESERT USE SCREOULE <br />10Jun <br />He noted staff and cookware used for these projects will be separate <br />from the jail food services. He also estimated a $60,000.00 savings for the <br />County on the LunchPlus program. <br />Mike Murphy, Director of Aging Services, reported the food service <br />contract for the LunchPlus Club was,put out for bids as the contract with the <br />current provider, Punchy's Diner, a local restaurant in Concord, is set to <br />expire soon. Further, he reported Aramark is the low bidder, contingent upon <br />approval of the leased kitchen space. He estimated the savings on the <br />LunchPlus program to be about $35,000.00 annually. <br />A lengthy discussion ensued. During discussion, Mr. Murphy and Mr. <br />Plante responded to questions from the Board. Issues addressed included the <br />following: equipment maintenance and affect of constant use; utility costs; <br />nutritional requirements; adherence to the Local Food Purchasing Policy <br />requirements; true value of lease space and kitchen operating expenses are <br />unknown; competitive disadvantage for local business; quality and quantity of <br />food provided by both entities; funding sources for the LunchPlus program; <br />etc. <br />Vice Chairman Poole MOVED to place both agenda items on the July 18, <br />2011 Agenda under New Business and asked to have data qualifying the value of <br />the kitchen space provided by the regular meeting. <br />Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Burrage seconded the MOTION <br />and the motion unanimously carried. <br />Mr. Murphy noted the term and renewal options for the proposed <br />contract. <br />Tax Administration - Progress Report 2012 Revaluation Project <br />Brent Weisner, Tax Administrator, presented a progress report for the <br />2012 Revaluation Project, which included the following flow chart: <br />2012 REVALUATION - PROJECT FLOW CHART <br />2919 2919 M10 1010 MIT 2011 <br />MIT nil nil MIT MIT Mil nil 2011 4911 Mtl <br />SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEU <br />NFRCII APRIL 2ARY JU71C JULY LUG SEPT OCT NOY DEC <br />DEVELOP AND ADOPT SCHEDULE OF VALUES <br />DOV.RLSERATESANOCEP IARLCS <br />iS00 1100. <br />C REATE T-T FItJ_ <br />0 -STp <br />CREATEREVALNLE <br />T90p <br />FRICEOUTSLUY' WIFFATURE`J <br />31 -D.0 <br />I.MPr <br />MAIL MCOME GUEST ONNARES <br />MAY IST LAST) YRS <br />x411 COlT GUTSTONNAIRC4 <br />W.M.49.9, 6 r ..IT W, MI. <br />CAP RATE Oa1alOPmtln1 <br />1•U, <br />31JIII <br />O EVELOP PRESERT USE SCREOULE <br />10Jun <br />TW.LLDT DUILN216 LM•SC RATES <br />]NN <br />PRCS[- SCHTDULC OF Y•LIICS <br />I }A.aD <br />MM,M 11CAFF.0 <br />ADOPT SCHEDULE OE VALUES <br />t95tlp <br />17.041 <br />= ED UZOPEN FOR INSPEMIDN <br />SCI, €vuLE OPFH FOR ARPE/LL <br />1}A.p 10.2002 <br />o-ON 1tl Nm <br />COMMERCIAL APPRAISAL <br />PICTOUETRYr MLSREYIEWISALES <br />so 010 10W <br />A.— OROI•L NON •PPRU9Al9 <br />PRCJECI ED PARCEL COVNT <br />0 1,O.D L290 1,200 1,300 1,300 TOO <br />ACTUN.IWR:EI COUNT <br />0 0 <br />1CCU1JU__TP11 NCE <br />I1,M01 <br />RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL <br />PICTORETAYI NR.B REVIEW IaKEB <br />14909 20000 23000 0000 <br />4000 8805 <br />R FINOENTIAANDH APrll•IS <br />raDJtCTED rRRC¢c evxT <br />AnLUU PARm couNr <br />ss99 0399 11s9n 11,999 11.e99 11999 11A99 7s0 <br />2su rz.la <br />nccMJUwmzc Dlrr[RLHCC <br />1z n92 !D1 <br />NEW CONST I SPLITS I MISC PIU <br />sm P.DatOCO1— <br />2MELD OCT ,9T <br />ii N lamp. TEF CHIN <br />_COR11100ROOIF. W. <br />M MST <br />REPORT TO CIANXIMIONERS <br />PHDNFS <br />REwew <br />2017 N12 2011 2912 2012 2011 M12 <br />JAN PER MARCH APRIL NAY JUN= JULY TOTAL <br />100X. <br />19O% <br />tOOX <br />90% <br />TS'. <br />1.041 <br />9-1 <br />0!i <br />0% <br />OY. <br />1�e P111.11 <br />1.10: 0W! <br />F3i.! nN RI OION <br />41.01: w.Ory <br />ovIAA <br />rs.� Ts.eas <br />taasr PN MunIH <br />DT TA <br />FINAL REVIEW AND TAXPAYER NOTIFICATION <br />2Jai � <br />APPEALS PROCESS <br />S f00 <br />1NT0 <br />2sa2 3Wt <br />0 0•l. <br />IOtl 00. 000Y. <br />�i <br />.OIL 'I II UVL =CNPI. C,T <br />Mr. Weisner advised the Schedule of Values, the document used to <br />conduct appraisals, will be presented in August and requires a 3 -month <br />adoption process, including a public hearing. <br />Chris Ferris, Real Property Manager, presented an update on the <br />commercial appraisal process, noting income questionnaires were mailed with <br />approximately ten (10) percent of responses received at this time. He <br />advised this information will be used in determining commercial values. <br />