My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2010 02 26 Board Retreat
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2010
>
BC 2010 02 26 Board Retreat
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2010 12:20:44 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:01:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
4/20/2010
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 26, 2010 (Board Retreat) Page 1824 <br />Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) - Discussion <br />Chairman White announced that during the past 12 - 18 months, the Board <br />has discussed moving Voluntary Mitigation Payments (VMP) from being paid at <br />platting to permitting without changing the Ordinance. <br />A general discussion ensued and the following issues were addressed: <br />the VMP's have been moved to permitting in some instances; the County's <br />current practice of requiring payment at platting does not have to be <br />changed; requests can be addressed on a case-by-case basis; how can the <br />County help promote construction during an economic downturn; if the practice <br />is changed, it should be for a limited amount of time; how to address the <br />payment of VMP's for new projects and those under an existing consent <br />agreement; new construction projects will create a synergy within the county <br />that cannot be fully quantified; are banks lending money to developers; etc. <br />Vice Chairman Poole expressed support to accept requests from <br />developers under an existing consent agreement to change the payment of VMP's <br />from platting to permitting for a limited period of time. <br />John Day, County Manager, advised that no action is needed for new <br />consent agreements; however, the Board will need to give staff the authority <br />to amend existing consent agreements by adopting a resolution to that effect. <br />He also advised the item could be included on Monday's agenda. <br />Richard Koch, County Attorney, stated he would develop a one-page <br />template to address the modification to existing consent agreements. <br />Chairman White asked to receive an update every three (3) months. September <br />30, 2010 was selected as the cutoff date. <br />Recess of Meeting <br />p.m. <br />The Board took a dinner break at 5:54 p.m. The meeting resumed at 6:46 <br />Economic Development Grant Program - Review <br />The Economic Development Grant Program was generally discussed. Issues <br />addressed included the following: depreciation and life expectancy of <br />personal property; the inclusion of clawback provisions in grant agreement(s) <br />to protect taxpayers during the life of the grant; amending the County's <br />policy to: (1) address incentive offers made outside the scope of the <br />existing policy (3 years / 85 percent) - such offers shall be approved by the <br />Board before an offer is made to the grant recipient; and (2) including a <br />section that explains the County's expectations of the EDC (Economic <br />Development Corporation) as its agent; how often are employment (job <br />creation) numbers verified and by whom; piggybacking on State grant <br />requirements; requiring the EDC to notify the County of serious inquiries so <br />the County can decide what direction to take; the need for quarterly activity <br />reports from the EDC; EDC bylaws; the unusual manner in which the EDC's <br />annual audit was presented to EDC Board members; what are the EDC's mission, <br />vision and goals; the need for the EDC to focus its efforts on expansion of <br />small/medium sized businesses (up to 85 percent) to create one or two jobs; <br />grants, small business loans and other resources that could be used to <br />stimulate business development; and the need for website addresses to conduct <br />additional research. <br />Mission/Vision Statements <br />The Board reviewed both statements. No changes were made to either <br />statement. <br />Reedy Creek Sewer Line <br />Commissioner Carruth provided a brief update on the installation of the <br />Reedy Creek sewer interceptor line installed by WSACC (Water Sewer Authority <br />of Cabarrus County) with monies from CMUD (Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility <br />Department). He advised the new line will create sewer access, increase <br />property values and spur growth. <br />John Day, County Manager, reported WSACC has imposed a prohibition on <br />connections to the sewer line until January 1, 2015 or until a study is <br />completed to address the availability of adequate public facilities relating <br />to schools, transportation and water and sewer. A general discussion ensued. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.