Laserfiche WebLink
May 25, 2010 (Recessed Meeting) <br />Page 1937 <br />over the coming years. These measures achieve a new equilibrium <br />- a new state of normalcy - matched to the new economy. <br />FY 2011 <br />The property tax rate for FY 2011 remains unchanged at 63 cents <br />and General Fund expenditures are projected at $194.7 million, <br />nearly unchanged from the original budget adopted last June. It <br />is important to note, however, that property tax revenues are <br />expected to decline by nearly $3 million, due primarily to the <br />closing of the Philip Morris cigarette manufacturing plant. <br />Sales tax revenue is also expected to decline due to state <br />Medicaid reform efforts and a change in the state's method of <br />distribution. The decline in revenue is offset by savings from <br />the reduction in staffing levels made in FY 2010, reductions in <br />operating costs (including a 50% reduction in contributions to <br />nongovernmental agencies), the use of capital reserves for some <br />capital outlay expenses and proceeds from the capitalization of <br />interest payments on debt service for new school construction. <br />Despite these cutbacks, current expense funding for the public <br />school systems goes up by $1.5 million, the Board - approved <br />personnel management plan, suspended in FY 2010, is reinstated <br />and 77 new positions are added near the end of the fiscal year to <br />operate the new detention center. Admittedly austere, the FY <br />2011 budget establishes a new sense of normalcy and arguably <br />meets the essential needs of our community. Additional summary <br />and statistical information concerning revenues and expenditures <br />for FY 2011 are found in the Budget Summary, beginning on page <br />39. <br />FY 2012 - FY 2015 <br />The remaining four years of the five -year planning period are <br />projected to be equally austere, but some spending increases will <br />be necessary to meet the essential needs of our community. A <br />complete narrative summary and year by year revenue and expense <br />figures for the Five -Year Financial Plan begin on page 77. <br />Expenses <br />The fully annualized cost of the detention officers (plus some <br />additional related positions) added near the end of FY 2011 are <br />felt in FY 2012, adding about $3 million in expenses. Additional <br />debt service costs approaching $5 million for schools currently <br />under construction also hits in FY 2012. Other additional <br />expenses in the planning period include an increase of $840,000 <br />each year for public school current expense spending, an average <br />of $2.8 million each year to fund the personnel management plan, <br />a new expense of $1.3 million beginning in FY 2013 for <br />improvements in and around the North Carolina Research Campus and <br />a new expense of $900,000 beginning in FY 2014 to service the <br />debt for a public parking deck in downtown Concord to serve the <br />courthouse. Other than the increases already described, <br />operational expenses remain flat. Some small capital projects are <br />funded through the capital reserve fund, as seen the Capital <br />Improvement Plan beginning on page 85. <br />P PN7P7111 P.4 <br />While slow growth is expected in sales tax receipts and in <br />revenues related to development during the planning period, the <br />value of property (for purposes of taxation) is expected to <br />decline in FY 2013 when a revaluation takes effect. This decline <br />in valuation results, of course, from the Great Recession. Two <br />options are offered to address the shortfall in revenues. Both <br />options anticipate the adoption of a new 1/ percent sales tax by <br />referendum in FY 2012 and the use of lottery proceeds to assist <br />in meeting debt service obligations associated with new schools. <br />Both options also employ the judicious use of fund balance, <br />consistent with Board - adopted policies. Option A shows a total of <br />$10.5 million of fund balance appropriated for two years - FY <br />2012 and FY 2013. Option B uses a total of about $5.7 million <br />from fund balance over three years - FY 2012, FY 2014 and FY <br />2015. Finally, both options also rely on an increase in the <br />property tax rate, but in differing years and amounts. Option A <br />retains the current tax rate of 63 cents in FY 2013, the year of <br />