Laserfiche WebLink
January 20, 2009 (Regular Meeting) Page 1156 <br />over fifty trucks that are kept outside at all times. He said this down <br />zoning will affect him greatly in his business and he is against it. <br />Next, Chairman White called on Henry Kivett, resident of 4808 Fenwick <br />Place in Concord. Mr. Kivett stated his point of view has already been <br />expressed. <br />John Lentz, a resident of Hickory Ridge Road stated the property he is <br />addressing with the Board is his family old home place located on the corner <br />of Gold Hi11 Road and Neisler Road. He said he wants to share with the Board <br />that what the Board is discussing tonight, really impacts him and his family. <br />He asked the Board to look at the map and said we have over twenty acres and <br />the entire road frontage is in the City's jurisdiction, which is <br />residentially zoned. However, he said the plan is to adjust/change what is <br />left and put it in A0. He said this does not make sense to him and it does <br />not help his family in any way. He said he heard one gentleman say there are <br />2,700 people thought to be in favor of this plan. He said doesn't know the <br />2,700 people, but he knows about a hundred Lentz's that are not here tonight <br />that do not support this plan because of this situation and the impact on <br />their livelihood. He said he would appreciate the Board's consideration in <br />not passing the plan or adjusting it in some way to give them some relief. <br />Chairman White asked for verification of the roads names: Gold Hill <br />Road and Neisler Road. <br />Mr. Lentz confirmed and said the property is located on the corner of <br />Gold Hill and Neisler Road. He said you can see the green color on the map <br />represents the City's jurisdiction. The plan cuts our property in half and <br />it is not a good plan for us. <br />Chairman White thanked Mr. Lentz for his comments. <br />Russell Moose, resident of 12611 Highway 601 in Midland, said the <br />property he is talking about this afternoon is a 5.80 acre track located on <br />Zion Church Road between Highway 601 and Highway 49. He said this tract was <br />part of the original farm that is located across the street, which was cut in <br />half by Zion Church Road. He said the property is currently in the Farm Use <br />Program due to being part of the original farm. He said his mother and <br />father acquired the property from another family member around 1965; however, <br />in the late 70's and early 80's, Troy Cook, a former county commissioner, <br />developed Armentrout Drive into an industrial park and all the property in <br />that area became industrial. He said although property taxes increased, they <br />never argued the property taxes because they felt like the land was worth as <br />much or even more than what the county thought it was due to its zoning. He <br />said over the years there have been 15-20 people interested in purchasing the <br />land although it is not for sale. However, if the zoning is changed to Light <br />Industrial (LI) as referenced in the plan, he said the number of people <br />interested in buying the property will decline severely due to the zoning <br />being less. He said everybody he talks to says, "There is not that much <br />difference in the zoning". He said that is his argument. If it is not that <br />much different, he said then leave the zoning like it is; it is okay like it <br />is and it is fine with him. He said the problem is that we paid taxes for <br />many years on property zoned GI (General Industrial) and there is not going <br />to be a tax rebate. In addition, he said there is not going to be a decline <br />in the tax value. He said the taxes will be same as if the property was <br />still zoned GI but will be restricted from the following uses: concrete <br />plants, asphalt plants, chemical plants, storage trailers, and outside <br />storage (including temporary storage). He said as far as he knows, the <br />purpose of the Central Area Plan is to control urban sprawl, but there is not <br />much urban sprawl on industrial property. He said as County Commissioners, <br />you have the right to reject any kind of development that the county does not <br />want. For example, he said earlier the Board could have turned away the <br />gentlemen that wanted to build condominiums because that is your right. He <br />said we have avenues. in line to control these things and in his opinion, we <br />need to use the ones ,we have. He said this plan is not set up for everybody. <br />When your taxes are reevaluated, he said it is done across the board and does <br />not fit everybody; therefore, you have the right to file an appeal and plead <br />your case. In closing, he said he is pleading his case and thanked the Board <br />for their time. <br />Scott Robertson, resident of 113 Cabarrus Avenue East in Concord, said <br />the parcel he is concerned about is located at the corner of Buffalo Hills <br />and Highway 49. He distributed the following handouts to the Board: <br />Appendix B - Products of the Charrette; a zoning information map and <br />appraisal card for .parcel number 5549888214; and a handwritten list of <br />parcels under consideration at Highway 99 and Buffalo Hills: 5599888219, <br />