My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2009 05 29 Recessed - BOC/P&Z hearings
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2009
>
BC 2009 05 29 Recessed - BOC/P&Z hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2009 4:52:47 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:02:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
7/21/2009
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 28, 2009 (Recessed Meeting) Page 1421 <br />(C-16) Rezoning Case 2009-10 (R) - George Troutman - Zoning Atlae Amendment <br />to Rezone Property from CR to LDR <br />Susie Morris, Planning and Zoning Manager, announced the next two cases <br />to be heard by the Board are making similar rezoning requests and are located <br />in similar areas. <br />Ms. Morris presented the following information relating to Rezoning <br />Case 2009-10 (R) - George Troutman: this particular parcel is located at the <br />corner of Cold Springs Road and Highway 99; Mr. Robertson's property <br />[Rezoning Case 2009-15(R)] is located closer to the Cabarrus Arena and Events <br />Center; the request is for rezoning from Countryside Residential (CR) zoning <br />designation to Low Density Residential (LDR) designation; Mr. Troutman's <br />property is located in the Town of Mount Pleasant's utility service area; the <br />City of Concord is the utility provider in the closest proximity to the <br />subject property; the property is located in Area A as defined in the <br />Interlocal Agreement with the City of Concord regarding the Central Area Land <br />Use Plan (CALUP); in that agreement, Concord agreed not to extend utilities <br />into Area A without the consent of the County; there are exceptions to that <br />provision, none of which apply here; the applicant is asking for CR to be <br />rezoned to LDR; CR densities are one unit per two acres to one unit per acre; <br />LDR allows one unit per two acres or up to two acres if the amenity design <br />option is used for the subdivision; LDR zoning also permits minor <br />subdivisions; government water and sewer are optional in the LDR zoning <br />district; the subject property is designated Very Low Density Residential by <br />the CALUP; the CALUP states that areas defined as very low density are to <br />remain predominately rural in character while allowing residential uses to <br />occur at very low to low densities; predominate uses in these areas are <br />single-family residential, with one unit per two acres or up to two units per <br />acre, provided additional standards are met; this is a conventional rezoning <br />request; all uses permitted in the LDR district would be permitted on the <br />subject property; based on the land use designation assigned by the CALUP, <br />the proposed rezoning from CR to LDR is consistent with the densities <br />discussed in the plan; however, based on the Interlocal Agreement with the <br />City of Concord, utilities will not be available; the property is located in <br />Area A of this agreement and it explicitly states that the City of Concord <br />will not extend utilities into this area without the consent of the County; <br />therefore, the Board must consider the facts presented to decide if this is <br />an appropriate rezoning for this area. <br />In response to questions from the Board, Ms. Morris used a map to show <br />the utility service boundary between Concord and Mt. Pleasant. <br />John Day, County Manager, pointed out that while the subject property <br />is located in the Mt. Pleasant service area, Mt. Pleasant cannot feasibly <br />provide service due to monetary constraints. A brief discussion ensued. <br />Chairman White opened the public hearing at 5:35 p.m. The Public <br />Hearing Notice was published on May 8 and 15, 2009 in THE INDEPENDENT <br />TRIBUNE. The Public Hearing Notice was also posted on the Cabarrus County <br />website on May 7, 2009. <br />Mitchell Hartsell, who resides at 4166 Amarillo Drive, Concord, spoke <br />on behalf of his father-in-law, George Troutman. He stated his rezoning <br />request passed at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting, but not by a super <br />majority. He said the property is consistent with the zoning of the <br />surrounding property and identified his property on the map. <br />Ms. Morris stated the map currently provided to the Board does not <br />reflect the rezonings approved by the Planning and Zoning Board. She said <br />the GIS maps will be updated after the appeals have been processed. <br />Mr. Hartsell further commented on future utility extensions and <br />responded to questions from the Board regarding future plans for the <br />property. <br />With there being no one else to address the Board, Chairman White <br />closed the public hearing. <br />UPON MOTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Vice Chairman Mynatt, <br />and unanimously carried, the Board approved the rezoning request for Parcel <br />Identification Number 5559-98-6689, Case 2009-10 (R) - George Troutman. <br />UPON MOTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Commissioner Carruth, <br />and unanimously carried, the Board adopted the following Consistency <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.