Laserfiche WebLink
May 28, 2009 (Recessed Meeting) Page 1422 <br />Statement as it relates to rezoning Case 2009-10(R) - George Troutman, Parcel <br />Identification Number 5559-98-6689: although the proposed rezoning is not <br />consistent with the CALUP, it is reasonable and in the public interest <br />because although the surrounding zoning is primarily the same as the existing <br />zoning, the uses of the properties in the area are more consistent with the <br />zoning as proposed to be rezoned. <br />(C-17) Rezoning Case 2009-15 (R) - Scott C. Robertson - Zoning Atlas <br />Amendment to Rezone Property from CR to LDR <br />Susie Morris, Planning and Zoning Manager, presented the following <br />information regarding Rezoning Case 2009-15(R) - Scott Robertson: the <br />applicant is asking for his property currently zoned Countryside Residential <br />(CR) to be returned to the Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning; there are <br />four parcels involved in this request for a total of 12.85 acres; this <br />property is located inside the City of Concord's service area, however, it is <br />located outside the utility service boundary established as part of the <br />Central Area Land Use Plan (CALUP) and in the Interlocal Agreement; CR, the <br />current zoning designation, was put in place in January 2009 and allows <br />densities of one unit per two acres or one unit per acre if open space design <br />standards are used; minor subdivisions are permitted in CR; in the CR <br />district, public utilities are not permitted; in the LDR district, densities <br />are one unit per two acres or up to two acres if the amenity design option is <br />used for the subdivision; this property is located in an area designated as <br />Very Low Density Residential in the CALUP; LDR is to remain predominately <br />rural in character and uses in those area are single-family residential with <br />densities up to one unit per two acres or up to two units per acre, provided <br />additional development standards are met; this is a conventional rezoning <br />request; conditions may not be added; based on the land use designation <br />assigned by the CALUP, the proposed rezoning from CR to LDR is consistent <br />with the densities discussed in the CALUP; based on the Interlocal Agreement <br />with the City of Concord, utilities will not be available; the property is <br />located in Area A of this agreement and it explicitly states that the City of <br />Concord will not extend utilities into this area without the consent of the <br />County; therefore, the Board should review the information and facts <br />presented to determine if the proposed rezoning amendment is consistent with <br />the Board's goals and visions for this area. Ms. Morris responded to <br />questions from the Board regarding the location of the property. <br />Chairman White opened the public hearing at 5:96 p.m. The Public <br />Hearing Notice was published on May 8 and 15, 2009 in THE INDEPENDENT <br />TRIBUNE. The Public Hearing Notice was also posted on the Cabarrus County <br />website on May 7, 2009. <br />Scott Robertson, who resides at 113 Cabarrus Avenue East, Concord, said <br />the proposed change is consistent with the densities designed in the CALUP. <br />He said it is in the public interest and reasonable because the proposed <br />rezoning is more consistent with actual uses of the surrounding properties. <br />He expressed concern that through governmental action, his property has <br />become non-conforming to zoning ordinances. He also commented on the <br />"pastoral feel" described in the Zoning Ordinance for CR and the number of <br />options presented during the CALUP process for LDR, and responded to <br />questions from the Board regarding future plans for the property. <br />In response to questions posed by Commissioner Carruth, Ms. Morris <br />stated that the densities for CR are consistent with the LDR classification <br />in the CALUP. She stated the densities in the LDR zoning district are <br />consistent with the densities in the LDR component of the CALUP. She stated <br />that this area was designated as CR because it is located on the south side <br />of Highway 99, where which public utilities are not available. <br />With there being no one else to address the Board, Chairman White <br />closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Privette MOVED to approve the rezoning request for Parcel <br />Identification Numbers 5549-88.-8214, 5549-88-5136, 5599-87-7719 and 5549-88- <br />2354, Case 2009-15(R) -Scott Robertson. The MOTION failed for lack of a <br />second. <br />Commissioner Carruth MOVED to deny the rezoning request for Parcel <br />Identification Numbers 5599-88-8219, 5549-88-5136, 5599-87-7719 and 5549-88- <br />2359, Case 2009-15(R) - Scott Robertson. The MOTION failed for lack of a <br />second. <br />Recess of Meeting <br />