Laserfiche WebLink
May 28, 2009 (Recessed Meetinq) <br />Page 1913 <br />that we are doing or will do on our property adversely affects <br />the purpose of the plan. <br />Regards, <br />Jennifer L. Price and Ronda S. York <br />In response to questions from the Board, Ms. Morris reported the <br />following: the applicant is at the maximum number of lots permitted and any <br />additional subdivisions would be considered major subdivisions and would have <br />to be processed through the Cabarrus Planning and Zoning Board also be <br />subject to the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO); if the property <br />stays designated as AO, at least 40 percent of the property must be open <br />space; to continue selling off lots within the AO zoning, the property would <br />have to be developed as a conventional subdivision and would have to have <br />some type of access; etc. <br />Ms. Morris also explained that AO and CR zoning classifications are <br />very similar. She stated AO zoning classifications allows for additional <br />farming uses. <br />Commissioner Carruth reviewed some of the land uses not permitted under <br />the CR zoning district. <br />Chairman White opened the public hearing at 4:12 p.m. The Public <br />Hearing Notice was published on May 8 and 15, 2009 in THE INDEPENDENT <br />TRIBUNE. The Public Hearing Notice was also posted on the Cabarrus County <br />website on May 7, 2009. <br />Darrell Furr, who resides at 3800 Cold Springs Road South, Concord, <br />stated he owns property adjacent to the subject property. He stated there is <br />already a large subdivision nearby and that he has heard a gas line will be <br />installed through the area reaching A. T. Allen School. He also commented on <br />development pressure in surrounding area. <br />With there being no one else to address the Board, Chairman White <br />closed the public hearing. <br />Vice Chairman Mynatt stated she attended planning meetings for the <br />CALUP and there was overwhelming public concern that the area around A. T. <br />Allen school not be developed. <br />A brief discussion ensued. The following issues were addressed: <br />utilities in the area; a possible gas line for the new A.T. A11en School; <br />etc. <br />UPON MOTION of Chairman White, seconded by Vice Chairman Mynatt with <br />Chairman White, Vice Chairman Mynatt and Commissioners Carruth and Poole <br />voting for and Commissioner Privette voting against, the Board denied the <br />rezoning request for Parcel Identification Numbers 5559-23-6499 and 5559-22- <br />7117, Case 2009-05(R) - Jennifer Price and Ronda York. <br />UPON MOTION o£ Commissioner Carruth, seconded by Commissioner Poole and <br />unanimously carried, the Board adopted the following Consistency Statement as <br />it relates to the rezoning case of 2009-05(R) - Jennifer Price and Ronda <br />York, Parcel Identification Numbers (PIN) 5559-23-6499 and 5559-22-7117: the <br />proposed rezoning is not consistent with the Central Area Land Use Plan and <br />it is not reasonable and is not in the public interest because it is not <br />consistent with the plan and most, if not all, of the surrounding properties <br />are zoned Agricultural Open and of similar use. <br />(C-7) Rezoning Case 2009-06(R) - Patsy B. Whitley - Zonin Atlas Amendment <br />to Rezone Property from AO to CR <br />Susie Morris, Planning and Zoning Manager, presented the following <br />information regarding Rezoning Case 2009-06(R) - Patsy B. Whitley: the <br />applicant in this case is Patsy B. Whitley; the applicant requests to rezone <br />approximately 19.5 acres from Agricultural Open (AO) zoning designation to <br />Countryside Residential (CR) designation; the subject property is located in <br />the City of Concord service area, however, it located outside of the utility <br />service boundary established as part of the Central Area Land Use Plan <br />(CALUP) process; the densities that are proposed are not consistent with the <br />densities established in the CALUP; this is a conventional rezoning request; <br />all uses permitted in the CR district would be permitted on the subject <br />property if the request is approved based on the land use designation <br />assigned by the CALUP; and the proposed rezoning from AO to CR is not <br />consistent with the densities discussed in the plan, therefore the Board <br />