Laserfiche WebLink
May 28, 2009 (Recessed Meeting) Page 1414 <br />should review the information and determine whether the rezoning is <br />consistent with the goals and vision for that area. <br />Chairman White opened the public hearing at 9:19 p.m. The Public <br />Hearing Notice was published on May 8 and 15, 2009 in THE INDEPENDENT <br />TRIBUNE. The Public Hearing Notice was also posted on the Cabarrus County <br />website on May 7, 2009. <br />Darrell Furr, resident of 3800 Cold Springs Road South, Concord, stated <br />the applicant would like to keep the original zoning in order to be able to <br />subdivide the property in the future for her grandchildren. <br />With there being no one else to address the Board, Chairman White <br />closed the public hearing. <br />UPON MOTION of Chairman White, seconded by Commissioner Carruth with <br />Chairman White, Vice Chairman Mynatt and Commissioners Carruth and Poole <br />voting for and Commissioner Privette voting against, the Board denied the <br />rezoning request for Parcel Identification Number 5548-63-3875, Case 2009- <br />06(R) - Patsy B. Whitley. <br />UPON MOTION of Vice Chairman Mynatt, seconded by Commissioner Poole and <br />unanimously carried, the Board adopted the following Consistency Statement as <br />it relates to the rezoning of case 2009-06(R) - Patsy B. Whitley, Parcel <br />Identification Number 5548-63-3875: the proposed rezoning is not consistent <br />with the Central Area Land Use Plan and it is not reasonable and is not in <br />the public interest because it is not consistent with the plan and the <br />surrounding properties are zoned Agricultural Open and of similar use. <br />(C-8) Rezoning Case 2009-OS (R) - Gerald Newton - Zoning Atlas Amendment to <br />Rezone Property from AO to CR <br />Susie Morris, Planning and Zoning Manager, presented the following <br />information regarding Rezoning Case 2009-08 (R) - Gerald Newton: the <br />applicant in this case is Gerald Newton; this is a request to rezone <br />approximately 7 acres from Agricultural Open (AO) zoning designation to <br />Countryside Residential (CR) designation; the subject property is located in <br />the City of Concord service area, however, it is located outside of the <br />utility service boundary area established as part of the CALUP; the densities <br />proposed with CR are not consistent with what is proposed in the CALUP for <br />Rural Residential; this is a conventional rezoning request; all uses <br />permitted in the CR district would be permitted on the subject property based <br />on the land use designation assigned by the CALUP; the proposed rezoning from <br />AO to CR is not consistent with the densities discussed in the plan, <br />therefore the Board should consider the information and decide whether the <br />rezoning is consistent with the goals for that area. <br />Ms. Morris responded to questions from the Board regarding the <br />potential subdivision of the subject property. <br />Chairman White opened the public hearing at 9:22 p.m. The Public <br />Hearing Notice was published on May 8 and 15, 2009 in THE INDEPENDENT <br />TRIBUNE. The Public Hearing Notice was also posted on the Cabarrus County <br />website on May 7, 2009. <br />Chairman White clarified that the applicant will be allotted 5 minutes <br />for comments. <br />Jerry Newton, resident of 1776 Songwood Road, Concord, presented the <br />following information regarding his rezoning request: the subject property <br />is in the middle of a neighborhood; the lots across the street are roughly <br />acre lots; the property was purchased several years ago with the intention of <br />eventually giving it to his children; public water lines already exist on <br />Songwood Road; the property does not perk and is dependent on the exemption <br />that allows plats of one acre; etc. <br />Mr. Newton recited a passage from page 19, section 9.0 of the Central <br />Area Use Plan as follows: "Rural: Comprised mostly of lands determined to <br />remain agrarian in the future. Residential uses may be allowed but only to <br />support agrarian purposes and are not the predominant use." He stated that <br />housing is a predominant use of this subdivision. He stated that the AO <br />zoning designation requires a 90 percent open space allotment; the property <br />owner must give up ownership of that land; and that the land must be donated <br />to Cabarrus County, Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District, a <br />land conservatory, or a homeowners' association. He stated another reason he <br />