Laserfiche WebLink
February 19, 2007 (Regular Meeting) Fage 278 <br />Commissioner Mynatt asked if there had been any neuotiating withthe <br />developers for the donation of land for a school site. <br />Jonathan Marshall, Commerce Director, reported two of the properties <br />being considered tonight are too small for a school site. He said the <br />developers of the Rustic Canyon subdivision did offer land, but upon review <br />it was deemed unsuitable because of topography. If a developer offers <br />acceptable land, he reported the value of the land is credited towards the <br />adequacy amount. <br />Commissioner Privette pointed out the County will incur a deficit of <br />$8,000.00 per lot if the consent agreement is approved. <br />Mr. Marshall reported the adequacy amount is based on the Board's <br />policy of 50 percent of the capital costs and that the Board could -adopt the <br />draft Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance or change its current policy. In <br />response to a question from Chairman Carruth, he reported these subdivisions <br />would be vested under the current policy, if a new one were adopted. <br />A general discussion ensued. <br />Vice Chairman Juba asked Mr. Stark if the build-out schedule could be <br />modified. Mr. Stark stated Meridian Development Group (MDG) has to build <br />14,000 linear feet of sanitary sewer lines, 12,000 linear feet of water lines <br />and already has a financial agreement in place with the bank based on the <br />current build-out schedule. In lieu of amending the build-out schedule, he <br />stated MDG is willing to pay an additional $2,000.00 per lot. Based on the <br />price of the homes, he said the extra amount could be absorbed. <br />Mr. Stark responded to questions from the Board. <br />Vice Chairman Juba asked Mr. Stark to confirm that MDG is willing to <br />pay more to advance adequacy. Mr. Stark responded in the affirmative. <br />Commissioner Mynatt asked if that option is available to the County. <br />Mr. Koch stated there is no legal prohibition against a developer doing <br />more than what the policy prescribes. <br />Vice Chairman Juba MOVED to approve the Consent Agreement for the <br />Hawthorn Subdivision, including the payment of $6,000.00 per lot to advance <br />school adequacy. <br />Commissioner Mynatt seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Privette stated he would like to make a substitute motion <br />and commented on the fact that there is a liability of $12,000.00 for every <br />new home and if the fee is increased to $6,000.00 that still leaves a <br />$6,000.00 deficit for the citizens. <br />Chairman Carruth reported when the policy was created, the Board did <br />not want to pass 100 percent of the burden onto the developers, which is why <br />the policy was set at 50 percent. <br />The substitute motion died for lack of a second. <br />UPON MOTION of Vice Chairman Juba, seconded by Commissioner Mynatt with <br />Chairman Carruth, Vice Chairman Juba and Commissioners Mynatt and White <br />voting for and Commissioner Privette voting against, the Board approved the <br />Consent Agreement between Cabarrus County and Merdian Development Group, LLC, <br />for the Hawthorne Subdivision, including the payment of $6,000.00 per lot to <br />advance school adequacy and a build out schedule of no more than 29 ].ors <br />platted in 2007; no more than 32 lots platted in 2008; no more than 32. lots <br />platted in 2009; and no more than 16 lots platted in 2010. <br />(G-7) Consent Agreement - The Pointe at St. Andrews Subdivision Proiect <br />Kassie G. Watts, Planner, reported a preliminary plat extension was <br />approved by the Cabarrus County Planning and Zoning Board on January 1P„ <br />2007. She said the developer has been working with the City of Concord for <br />the past few months to finalize the construction drawings and would not have <br />been able to file a final plat within the two-year timeframe. She reported <br />the developer, TWAM, LLC, had an executed consent agreement that included the <br />payment of $9,034.00 per lot to advance school adequacy that was due at <br />building permitting. She pointed out the current policy is to accept the <br />payment at final platting. She reported students from this project will <br />