My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2007 05 22 Recessed Mtg.
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2007
>
BC 2007 05 22 Recessed Mtg.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2007 4:12:48 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:03:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
9/18/2007
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 22, 2007 (Recessed Meeting) <br />Page 377 <br />The Board of Commissioners for the County of Cabarrus met in recessed <br />session in the Multipurpose Room at the Cabarrus County Governmental Center <br />in Concord, North Carolina on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 at 3:30 p.m. <br />Present - Chairman: Robert W. Carruth <br />Vice Chairman: Joni D. Juba <br />Commissioners: Grace M. Mynatt <br />H. Jay White, Sr. <br />Absent - Commissioner: Coy C. Privette <br />Also present were John D. Day, County Manger; Mike Downs, Deputy County <br />Manager; Pam Dubois, Deputy County Manager; Loretta Lee, Budget and <br />Performance Manager; Kay Honeycutt, Clerk to the Board; and Lori Hinson, <br />Deputy Clerk to the Board. <br />Call to Order <br />Chairman Carruth called the meeting to order at 3:35 p.m. <br />FY OB Budget Overview <br />John Day, County Manager, reviewed the following budget message for FY <br />08 and responded to several questions from the Board. <br />To the Honorable Chairman and Cabarrus County Board of Commissioners: <br />Moving in to FY 2008, the county's departments continue to <br />increase and enhance programs and services while holding the line <br />on spending. The efficient and progressive manner in which the <br />county departments operate is evidenced through a number of state <br />and national recognitions received during the past year. <br />I expect this trend to continue with the addition of <br />performance management for FY 2008. By implementing performance <br />management, departments will tie in their goals, successes and <br />performance measures with the overall goals of the county, as <br />determined by the Board. This new measurement device will better <br />ensure efficiency and accountability. <br />This year's budget and the five-year financial plan, <br />however, give reason for concern by illustrating the considerable <br />costs of growth. From FY 2008 to FY 2012, General Fund spending <br />is expected to increase by about $65 million, or nearly 99~. <br />About 95~ o£ that, or $80.5 million, goes to increases in school <br />operating expenses and new debt service requirements, mostly <br />related to school construction. These two areas drive not only <br />spending priorities, but also tax rates. <br />For FY 2008, the tax rate returns to 63 cents (up from <br />62.89 cents in FY 2007) . The two largest areas of increase are <br />school operational costs, up more than 17$, at $6.61 million,-and <br />debt service, which increases by $5.62 million. Together, these <br />two increases alone account for 7$ of the entire $179 million <br />General Fund budget. <br />This spending trend continues throughout the five-year <br />planning period, which includes a Capital Improvement Plan (CI P) <br />totaling nearly one-half billion dollars. Fourteen and one-half <br />percent of the funding for the CI P, about $71.7 million, comes <br />from cash. The remainder is financed. <br />Recently, the county's two school systems requested about <br />$470 million over the next five years for new schools, additions <br />and renovations. The CIP includes only those school construction <br />projects that produce new "seats" for students. The cost of those <br />22 projects including financing costs (but not interest payments) <br />totals $373.4 million, producing 11,626 new seats. <br />Property revaluation occurs in FY 2009, but the tax rate <br />will need to remain at 63 cents, primarily to pay for student <br />growth and school construction. Holding the tax rate constant <br />through the revaluation is equivalent to an 18~ tax increase, on <br />average. The following three years require tax increases of 8 <br />cents, 9.5 cents and 6 cents, respectively, to support student <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.