Laserfiche WebLink
May 22, 2007 (Recessed Meeting) <br />Page 378 <br />population growth and school construction. That's an 18.5 cents <br />tax increase on top of an 18$ increase from revaluation. <br />This trend of rapidly escalating spending on school <br />operational costs and debt service for new school construction is <br />expected to continue after the five-year planning period. <br />Current projections show the need for at least seven new schools <br />and one expanslon for the next five-year period beginning in <br />2013. <br />There is no single way to moderate this trend of steadily <br />increasing population and taxes, but there are several steps <br />that, taken together, might have the desired effect: <br />1. Increase the amount of the voluntary school adequacy <br />mitigation payments. <br />2. Encourage the municipalities to place considerable limits on <br />utility extensions. <br />3. Maximize the amount of land zoned for employment purposes and <br />reduce the amount zoned residential across all jurisdictions. <br />9. Consider placing annual caps on residential development across <br />the entire county. <br />5. Consider reducing permitted residential densities in targeted <br />areas across .all jurisdictions. <br />Plans are under way to bring together elected officials <br />representing all local governments in the county for a summit on <br />growth to address these issues and come to a consensus on ways to <br />handle growth countywide. Hopefully, this summit will be <br />fruitful and .some or all of the five steps described above will <br />be implemented. <br />This budget, along with its five-year financial plan and <br />CIP, fulfills the county's obligations and meets the critical <br />needs of its citizens. It does not, however, include funding for <br />the Kannapolis City Council's request for $150 million from <br />Cabarrus County over 25 years for municipal infrastructure <br />improvements and beautification projects. If the Board of <br />Commissioners desires to grant the city council's request, it may <br />do so in one of three ways, or in any combination of them: <br />1. Raise taxes above the proposed levels found in this <br />document. <br />2. Cut funding for school operations or school construction. <br />3. Cut funding for county programs. <br />In addition to the five-year financial plan and CIP, a <br />concise summary of expenditures and revenues for FY 2008 begins <br />on page C-1. Thorough descriptions of county programs, services <br />and expenses may be found in the program summaries, which begin <br />on page G-l. The county staff and I look forward to assisting you <br />in reviewing this information. <br />I appreciate the efforts of the many people who contributed <br />to the preparation of this document and offer them my sincere <br />gratitude. I especially want to thank Deputy County Managers Pam <br />Dubois and Mike Downs, Budget & Performance Manager Loretta Lee <br />and Budget Analyst Becky Crabtree for their considerable efforts. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />/s/ John Day <br />John Day, County Manager <br />Expenditure Summary and Summary of Poaitiona <br />Loretta Lee, Budget and Performance Manager, reviewed the following <br />budget related information: FY 08 Ad Valorem Tax Revenue Generation <br />Estimate; proposed fee changes for the following departments: Environmental <br />Protection, Parks, Emergency Management/Eire Marshal and Commerce; Revenues <br />by Fund for the General Fund, Landfill Fund, Arena Fund, and the Tourism <br />Fund; Summary of Expenditures by Service Area for all Funds; the number of <br />new positions requested and the County Manager's recommendation (52.09 FTE's <br />and 33.72 FTE's respectively); and requests for position reclassifications or <br />change in hours. <br />