Laserfiche WebLink
<br />March 11, 2006 - Recessed Meeting <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />521 <br /> <br />etc.; infrastructure that will provide an integrated utility system and <br />improved transportation system; and a desire to maintain the county/s <br />heritage and continue to be different from Charlotte. Also, the Board <br />reviewed the Cabarrus Compact signed by all members in January 2005 and the <br />following excerpt from Resolution No. 2005-26 that was adopted in September <br />2005 as a follow-up to the August 2005 retreat: <br /> <br />Invite other local government human service providers, educators, <br />stakeholders, and other institutions involved in meeting human <br />and education needs in Cabarrus County to join with the Cabarrus <br />County Board of Commissioners in developing a long range, <br />community wide effort to improve the prosperity, educational <br />achievement, and health of the community by addressing the issues <br />that lead to poverty, poor health, crime and barriers to creating <br />community wealth through collaboration and integration of effort <br />that cuts across jurisdictional and service provision boundaries. <br /> <br />At 10:35 a.m., the Board took a short break. <br /> <br />The meeting reconvened at 10:58 a.m. <br /> <br />Develop a Sense of Directionl Mission and Vision <br /> <br />Mr. Day facilitated a discussion on the role of the Board and <br />identified the following three components of a mission statement: (1) What <br />is the Board's purpose; (2) Who are its customers/clients, and (3) What <br />products and services does it provide. He pointed out the Board members are <br />elected on a county-wide basis and are representatives of all persons in the <br />county. <br /> <br />Mr. <br />words or <br />services, <br /> <br />Day led Board Members through an exercise to help identify key <br />concepts for a mission statement that would include purpose, <br />clients and end result. <br /> <br />The Board identified the following words during the discussion: <br /> <br />Purpose: <br /> <br />Communicate, Collaborate, Advocate, Set Policy, Allocate <br />Resources, Educate, etc. <br />Mandated Services, Sound Fiscal Policy, Direction, Respond to <br />Community Demand, etc. <br />Citizens, Residents, Visitors, Affiliated Organizations, <br />Businesses, etc. <br />Quality of Life, Prosperity, Provide Viable Employment Base, <br />Increase Property Value, etc. <br /> <br />Services: <br /> <br />Clients: <br /> <br />End Result: <br /> <br />At 12:17 p.m., the Board recessed for lunch. <br /> <br />The meeting reconvened at 12:40 p.m. <br /> <br />Identify the Core Values that Should Guide the Board' s/Government' s Actions <br />in the Future <br /> <br />Mr. Day led a discussion on how to identify the core values that should <br />guide the Board's actions in the future. He asked Board Members to think <br />about the following questions when identifying core values: What core <br />values, principles or criteria should guide how the Board carries out its <br />missioni what values or principles have guided the Board's actions and <br />decisions in the past; what enduring qualities do Board Members want the <br />county to be known for; etc. <br /> <br />Board Members identified such words as integrity, honesty, respect, <br />courage, credibility, accountability, responsive, trust/stewardship, team <br />work/collaboration, etc. <br /> <br />Develop a Sense of Direction, Mission and Vision (continued) <br /> <br />Mr. Day asked Board Members to consider the following questions: What <br />is the Board's best future; what does the Board aspire to be; what is the <br />ideal destination; where do you want to go; how do you want the community to <br />be different than it is now; etc. Mr. Day also provided examples of <br />mission/vision statements from other businesses, local governments and <br />Fortune 500 Companies. <br /> <br />Mr. Day asked Board members to write down words describing what the <br />Board would look like for an ideal future. The Board identified the <br />following: best; credibilitYi the model for governance in North Carolina; <br />