My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2006 09 05 RECESSED
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2006
>
BC 2006 09 05 RECESSED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2006 8:54:40 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:04:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />September 5, 2006 (Recessed Meeting) <br /> <br />Page 90 <br /> <br />one to stand up and be recognized. The following property owners were <br />recognized: Lavon Benton, Boyce Morrison, Bill Morrison and Fred Wally. He <br />asked the aforementioned property owners to indicate their unwillingness to <br />sell right-of-ways by a show of hands. He said Mr. Wayne will have to <br />abandon a portion of this proj ect or ask a governmental body to condemn <br />property on his behalf. Four of the properties, he said are in farmland <br />production and two of these properties are in the Cabarrus County Voluntary <br />Agriculture District. He said part of these properties could be condemned <br />because of this proj ect and asked is it right for property owners to have <br />their land condemned so a developer can make a few more dollars. He reported <br />this proj ect will also require a sanitary sewer right-of-way and said Mr. <br />Day's memorandum addresses all the growth problems that will arise if the <br />Board allows a sanitary sewer line to be installed to this site. He said he <br />agrees with Mr. Day's comments and suggested other properties should be <br />rezoned first and then rezone the subj ect property. To date, he said Mr. <br />Wayne has been unsuccessful in obtaining the 7,000 9,000 linear feet of <br />sanitary sewer right-of-way and reiterated this land is in farmland <br />production and would require condemnation to obtain a right-of-way. In <br />summary, he thanked Board members for their attention on a matter that is so <br />important to the community. He said there are many more items that could be <br />discussed including potential damage to nearby homes if blasting is used to <br />prepare the site. He reported the soil study indicates blasting may be used. <br />He said the school system wants to place a high school in western Cabarrus <br />County in 2010 and this site is being considered. If this property is <br />rezoned tonight, he said that opportunity is lost. In closing, he read the <br />following excerpts from the North Carolina General Statute 153A-341 regarding <br />zoning authority: (1) "prevent the overcrowding of the land; (2) avoid undue <br />concentration of population; and (3) lesson congestion on the streets". He <br />said this rezoning will cause all these problems to occur, not to go away. <br />He said the General Statutes also states "The regulations shall be made with <br />reasonable consideration to among other things, the character of the district <br />and its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to <br />conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of <br />land throughout the county". If the Board desires to follow these <br />regulations, he said then the Board will have to deny this rezoning petition. <br />Finally, he thanked the Board members for their time. <br /> <br />Colin Nowlin of 5391 Davidson Road in Davidson reported he lives across <br />the street from the proposed proj ect and is against the rezoning request. <br />Although you cannot see the site, he said truck noise will be heard 24 hours, <br />7 days a week. He said Davidson Road is being used as a maj or thoroughfare <br />and has a posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour (mph) which is too high. <br />If you do get up to the posted speed limit, he said you will realize Davidson <br />Road cannot be used as a major thoroughfare at thoroughfare speeds. He said <br />Davidson Road is already a "race track and let's not make the situation <br />worse". He said the project is not in alignment with the land use plan, does <br />not provide an adequate transitional buffer for his property and is not <br />conducive to this area. A good land use plan, he said would have the <br />infrastructure already in place and have funding for it. This project, he <br />said does not fit well into the overall big picture for this area. He said <br />Odell School Road is classified as a major thoroughfare, out of desperation <br />and drivers will naturally take the path of least resistance. Because NC <br />Highway 73 is already inundated with heavy traffic, he said all the overflow <br />weaves its way onto the minor collector roads and "maj or thoroughfare" is <br />just a name. He said Jim Johnson Road, Odell School Road, Shiloh Church Road <br />and Davidson Road are already dumping onto NC Highway 3, making it unsafe and <br />that cannot be helped. When a project like this one applies for rezoning or <br />for subdivision approval, he said public safety should be heavily considered. <br />If a sensible person were to review the definition of roads, he said they <br />would come to the conclusion that the word "major thoroughfare" is an urban <br />term used to define city streets and not rural roads. He said it is more <br />appropriate to designate NC Highway 3 as a major collector road rather than a <br />major thoroughfare because the dynamics are different between these two road <br />classifications. The speed limit, he said is 55 mph on NC Highway 3, but <br />that rate of speed is uncommon on the city streets where there are many <br />traffic lights and intersections. He said a traffic light at the <br />intersection of NC Highway 3 and Davidson Road and one at NC Highway 3 and <br />Odell School Road would disrupt the traffic flow of the 55 mph thoroughfare <br />and cause a daily traffic jam in all directions. With these added <br />disruptions and additional vehicles, he asked how much efficiency has been <br />gained. A reasonable person, he said would say the gain is zero. Next, he <br />reviewed road cross sections of the NCDOT 2000-2025 Long Range Transportation <br />Plan. He reported NCDOT has a minimum allowable lane width preference of 12 <br />feet for driver convenience, ease of operation and safety. Knowing that <br />funding is not keeping pace with the overwhelming growth rate, he said <br />upgrading roads to obtain this safe lane width is unobtainable and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.