My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2006 09 05 RECESSED
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2006
>
BC 2006 09 05 RECESSED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2006 8:54:40 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:04:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />September 5, 2006 (Recessed Meeting) <br /> <br />Page 91 <br /> <br />impracticable in the foreseeable future. Therefore, NCDOT established a <br />minimum tolerable lane width of 11 feet, which he said is from the center of <br />the road to the edge of the pavement and totals 22 feet of paved roadway. He <br />said this lane width is usually accompanied by a four-foot shoulder on each <br />side of the road for a total of 30 feet of roadway; can be paved or dirt and <br />is for emergency uses before entering the in slope of a ditch. He said <br />residents already tolerate a smaller than desirable road without a four-foot <br />shoulder on each side. I f you encounter a problem on this highway and need <br />to pullover, he said you will most likely be in the ditch which is a very <br />dangerous situation. He said distractions such as traffic lights, flat <br />tires, etc., causes the lane width to become much smaller in a short period <br />of time and making improvements on this project alone, is just a band aid and <br />will make a bad situation worse. Also, he reported the NCDOT 2002-2025 Long <br />Range Transportation Plan contains traffic studies such as specific average <br />daily traffic counts, recommendations, needs, capacities, deficiencies, ect., <br />and is the most recent information available. He presented the following <br />information from the thoroughfare plan: NCDOT recommended the cross-section <br />for NC Highway 73 be a five-lane urban section with sidewalks and a detailed <br />study should be conducted to analyze the effect the present and anticipated <br />land uses will have on this corridor. This road is heavily traveled commuter <br />corridor. The land use is dense residential and commercial with numerous <br />access points. The present two-lane cross-section is presently over <br />capacity. It is not sufficient to carry the 15,000 to 28,000 vehicles per <br />day expected in the corridor. NCDOT recommended a full cross-section for <br />Odell School Road including a full 24-foot two-lane rural section from NC 136 <br />to NC 73 and a four-lane urban section with sidewalks from NC 73 to <br />Mecklenburg County. The Odell Elementary School is at the intersection of <br />Odell School Road and NC 73; this corridor also carries traffic around Lake <br />Howell. The current eighteen to twenty-two foot cross sections of rolling <br />terrain will not be sufficient to carry the expected 7,000 to 10,000 vehicles <br />per day and traffic is expected to grow at five percent a year. For NC <br />Highway 3, the transportation plan states a portion of the existing two-lane <br />highway is not wide enough to carry the expected 12,800 vehicles per day. At <br />certain locations within the corridor, even the recommend cross-section will <br />not accommodate the expected 36,000 vehicles per day. He reported Davidson <br />Road is not mentioned in the thoroughfare plan, but it should be controlled <br />and managed. He also said he noticed several mistakes in the plan concerning <br />right-of-ways of 100 feet on NC Highway 3 and 60 feet on Odell School Road. <br />As you know, he said there are no deeded right-of-ways in this area and this <br />information is misleading to perspective developers. He said developers <br />should have the most accurate information possible so they can go into their <br />venture well informed. He said according to Ms. Zakraisek, the 2030 <br />transportation plan is not finished or adopted yet and making these <br />corrections now would be a great help to the developers. He said he <br />disagrees vii th the current road classifications and the way they are being <br />used in rezoning applications. If the transportation plan is used, at least <br />as a guide and recognizing these road deficiencies, he said travelers will <br />have a safer and more efficient system of roads. He said he realizes that <br />citizens must tolerate the overburdened roads and he his only asking for a <br />reasonable response. He asked how the County can make the road situation <br />worse. He also pointed out Mr. Wayne has a lowboy and other over-si zed <br />equipment traveling daily on 22-feet highways. He said he does not want to <br />be tied up in traffic jams in front of his own home and if he wanted the <br />convenience of living next door to a grocery store or contractor's yard, he <br />would have bought a home closer to town. Further, he reported he asked the <br />peti tioDer to look at vacant buildings properly zoned with better <br />accessibili ty to maj or thoroughfares. In closing, he thanked the Board for <br />allowing him to speak against this issue. <br /> <br />Boyce M. Morrison of 400 Avinger Lane, Apt. 263 in Davidson stated he <br />is the property owner of the "triangle area" on the maps. He said the <br />property crosses Odell School Road, the land is being used as farmland and he <br />would like to keep the property classified as it is now. <br /> <br />William E. Morrison, Jr. of 6311 Bentridge Drive in Charlotte said he <br />was born and raised near the subject property and he does not know of anyone <br />within a one mile radius who makes $90,000.00 a year. He said the purpose of <br />this meeting is not to question Mr. Wallace's character or Mr. Wayne's <br />business practices, but to consider a rezoning petition. After listening to <br />the comments, he said there are still many unanswered questions. He said Mr. <br />Wayne listened to the community, removed the concrete plant and added a <br />retail component to the proposal. He said the subject property is special, <br />which is another reason to keep it zoned as it is and the residents do not <br />want an eyesore in their community. He said he does not believe that Mr. <br />Wayne wants to be involved in retail businesses, but merely wants to obtain a <br />piece of property to build his company building. In closing, he said he is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.