Laserfiche WebLink
<br />May 23, 2005 - Regular Meeting <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />190 <br /> <br />At 9:50 p.m., Chairman Carpenter opened the public hearing for <br />Countywide Zoning Map Amendment C05-04(R) and the proposed new zoning <br />districts. She stated comments would be limited to three minutes. The Notice <br />of the Public Hearing was published in THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER (Cabarrus <br />Neighbors) on April 24, May 1, May 8 and May 15, 2005. <br /> <br />Chairman Carpenter reported the following letters have been received <br />and asked they be entered into the official record: City of Kannapolis (May <br />23, 2005); w. S. Galloway, P.E. (May 23, 2005); W. Kendall Foster, P.E. of <br />Ridgeline Development (May 21, 2005); and Randall G. Benton (May 16, 2005). <br /> <br />John Licari, property owner on Flowes Store Road, stated one house on <br />two acres was too much of a reduction in density. Further, he said he almost <br />had his land sold, but the school adequacy fee killed the sale and he did not <br />want to see the density go any lower. <br /> <br />Larry J. Marlow, a 27-year resident of Odell <br />2.5 mile area including Cessna Road, Untz Road, <br />zoned Countryside Residential. <br /> <br />School Road, asked that a <br />and Odell School Road be <br /> <br />Jim Flowers, property owner in Harrisburg and Realtor, complained the <br />large landowners who have owned their property for 50 to 60 years will lose a <br />lot of money if their property is down-zoned and the number of units per acre <br />reduced. He stated he was against the rezoning and was surprised the County <br />hired an outsider to help with the rezoning where there were so many capable <br />Planning staff members. <br /> <br />Tom Doran, a resident of the Odell School Road Community, said Board <br />members have a golden opportunity to make Cabarrus County more attractive and <br />desirable. He supported one acre lots and said development should occur in <br />a reasonable and responsible manner in order to bring the needed services to <br />the residents. <br /> <br />william Niblock, a developer and resident of Concord, stated he was in <br />favor of rewriting the ordinance and redrawing the zoning map, but expressed <br />concern that a vast majority of undeveloped property would not be feasible <br />for development based on the latest map. He expressed concern that the cost <br />of two- to three-acre lots with water and sewer would result in larger homes <br />priced at $700,000.00 to $800,000.00. Mr. Niblock recommended the Board delay <br />voting on the map until the zoning ordinance is complete so that both items <br />could be adopted at the same time. He also asked that the density and open <br />space requirements be reviewed as in his opinion they were too strict. <br /> <br />John Robbins, a resident of the Odell community, stated he respected <br />the process but more time was needed to work through the proposed zoning and <br />what makes economic sense in certain parts of the County. He said the <br />Countryside Residential zoning had been over applied in the proposed zoning <br />map and that Low Density Residential zoning made more economic sense. <br />Further, Mr. Robbins stated in his opinion one acre lots were not <br />economically viable in certain parts of the county. <br /> <br />Dean Goodman, resident of the Odell Community, asked for a show of <br />hands of audience members who were in support of one acre lots. <br />Approximately 12-15 persons raised their hands. He said members of the Odell <br />Community place a high value on the unique character and charm of the area <br />and characterized the community as a collage of well-kept homes and <br />developments that are distributed unobtrusively on a rural backdrop. He said <br />developers and the City of Kannapolis would turn their community into a <br />cluttered mess with cluster developments. Further, Mr. Goodman commented on <br />the overcrowded road conditions in the northwest area of the County. <br /> <br />Bill Smith, President of Cabarrus County Building Industry Association, <br />asked the Board to table the map amendment until the Designing Cabarrus <br />process is finished. He commented on the difference in appraised value for a <br />defined and undefined specific use and the relationship between density and <br />tax values. He said no decision should be made until it is determined how <br />much this will cost the County and developers. <br /> <br />Carl Hill, member of the Cabarrus County Planning and Zoning <br />Commission, commented on the punitive costs of too much open space. He said <br />the proposed map did not coincide with the Area Plans for Midland, Mt. <br />Pleasant and Harrisburg, which were developed by the citizens of those areas. <br />Mr. Hill stated there was a need for more High Density Residential in some <br />areas and larger lot sizes in other areas of the County. He said that the <br />needs and desires of the people should be taken into consideration. <br />