My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2005 12 19 REGULAR
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2005
>
BC 2005 12 19 REGULAR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2009 1:02:05 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:05:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/19/2005
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />December 19, 2005 - Regular Meeting <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />437 <br /> <br />people, to stop spending money prior to zoning approval and to put all the <br />facts about the Jail project on the Internet. <br /> <br />With there being no one else to address the Board, Chairman Carruth <br />closed that portion of the meeting at 8:26 p.m. and called for a short <br />recess. <br /> <br />Chairman Carruth reconvened the meeting at 8:39 p.m. He stated <br />F-4 (Sheriff's Office and Detention Center project Update and <br />Concerns on Jail overcrowding) would be discussed next. <br /> <br />Item No. <br />State's <br /> <br />(F-4) Sheriff's Office and Detention Center Project Update and State's <br />Concerns on Jail Overcrowding <br /> <br />Sheriff Riley introduced the Chief Jail Inspector who was present to <br />discuss the County's position with the State and clarify a number of issues <br />regarding the jail overcrowding. <br /> <br />John Harkins, Chief Jail Inspector with the N. C. Division of Facility <br />Services, stated he was at the meeting to end a letter writing campaign <br />dealing with the over population problem. He said the jail regularly runs 50 <br />to 60 percent over the approved occupancy rate and that number has to be <br />quickly reduced by an average of 40 to 50 inmates per day to ensure the <br />safety of the inmates and staff. Mr. Harkins stated he had written about <br />alternatives that could be studied but pointed out they were not necessarily <br />recommendations. Further, he commented on delays in building the Annex and <br />stated the project was not moving fast enough to provide the needed bed <br />space. <br /> <br />Mr. Harkins responded to a number of questions by Board members. He <br />reviewed some of the benefits, including medical costs, associated with <br />Electronic House Arrest (ERA) and the size of such programs in other <br />counties. He also addressed the issue of the pre-trial release program such <br />as the one being used in Rowan County and noted the Rowan County Jail is <br />currently over capacity. Also, he commented on the housing of inmates in <br />other counties and the process the State would follow if it became necessary <br />to take over the jail and reduce the number of inmates. Finally, Mr. Harkins <br />stated that the County must take action today to relieve the jail <br />overcrowding. <br /> <br />Chairman Carruth stated the Board had previously looked at Electronic <br />House Arrest. He asked Chief District Court Judge william G. Hamby, Jr., to <br />address the Board regarding this issue. <br /> <br />Judge Hamby reported local officials have been dealing with <br />overcrowding for several years. He reviewed the guidelines that were <br />established when Electronic House Arrest (ERA) was first discussed to <br />determine which inmates would be eligible if ERA were authorized. Judge Hamby <br />stated he and the Sheriff had reviewed the inmate confinement list earlier <br />this date and, based on the previously established guidelines, found only one <br />inmate who would be eligible for ERA. He also commented on the dramatic <br />increase in the County's population and the need to start acting now to deal <br />with the problem for the next 10 to 15 years. <br /> <br />Sheriff Riley reported personnel from the Sheriff's Department, working <br />in conjunction with the judicial system, perform many of the same functions <br />as the pretrial release program on a daily basis and that the suggested <br />alternative programs have been considered. He also commented on EHA <br />programs, Rowan County's pretrial release program and his contact with <br />Sheriffs in neighboring counties regarding availability of bed space to house <br />inmates from Cabarrus County. He outlined plans to begin housing 40 inmates <br />in Alamance County beginning in January and the verbal agreement that he has <br />with the Alamance County Sheriff for the bed space. <br /> <br />There was discussion regarding the pros and cons of Electronic House <br />Arrest and pre-trial release programs. <br /> <br />Chairman Carruth stated the issue before the Board was the approval of <br />a budget amendment to fund the housing of inmates in Alamance County. <br /> <br />John Day, County Manager, suggested the budget amendment of $325,000.00 <br />included in the Agenda be increased to $370,000.00 to accommodate <br />transferring 40 inmates rather than 35 as was previously discussed with <br />Sheriff Riley. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.