Laserfiche WebLink
April 19, 2004 Page 428 <br /> <br />However, the City told both landowners that in order to tap onto <br />city-owned water and sewer lines that were already available at <br />their properties, the landowners would be required to change <br />their plans to comply with the City's Unified Development <br />Ordinance (UDO). The landowners took issue with the attempt by <br />the City to control planning, zoning and development in areas <br />clearly not in the jurisdiction of the City, stating that such <br />action by the City is in violation of State law which prohibits <br />the City from exercising planning and zoning authority outside of <br />its corporate limits. <br /> <br />Therefore the landowners filed lawsuits against the City. The <br />landowners added the County as a co-defendant for two primary <br />reasons: (1) The County landowners insist the County defend its <br />sole authority to determine planning, zoning and development <br />standards within its jurisdiction, as well as the landowners' <br />right to depend on permission rightfully granted by the County <br />for their projects. (2) The landowners were aware of a series of <br />agreements entered into by the City and the County from 1988 to <br />1995 that directly address many water and sewer issues, including <br />the County's right to tap onto City lines and the reciprocal <br />right of the City to tap onto County lines. <br /> <br />The lawsuit is in court-ordered mediation. In the mediation, the <br />City of Concord has requested that the County consider the <br />adoption of the transitional zoning standards previously <br />discussed. The County has requested the City's cooperation in <br />fulfilling the requirements of a series of agreements entered <br />into between the City and the County from 1988 to 1995, including <br />the 1995 Utility Asset Transfer Agreement that calls for <br />amendments to the 1988 Reciprocal Agreement. These contracts <br />govern the manner in which utilities will be provided in the <br />unincorporated areas by the City of Concord in its capacity as a <br />regional utility provider. <br /> <br />In a good faith effort to reach a speedy and equitable resolution <br />to the lawsuit through mediation, the Board of Commissioners has <br />agreed to pursue the application of the so-called transitional <br />zoning standards throughout the entire unincorporated area of the <br />County, not just the areas around the municipalities slated for <br />annexation within the next five years. <br /> <br />County staff will provide a draft of these standards to the <br />public as soon as it is prepared. The Board will discuss the <br />draft in open session at its next meeting on April 20 at 6:00 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />(M) RECESS OF MEETING <br /> <br /> There being no further business to come before the Board, Chairman <br />Freeman recessed the meeting at 11:25 p.m. until 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April <br />20, 2004, at the Cabarrus County Governmental Center. <br /> <br />Clerk to the Board <br /> <br /> <br />