Laserfiche WebLink
February 17, 2003 Page 57 <br /> <br />5645 9210 $68,551.00 $1,239.55 $69,790.55 <br />Retirement <br />5645 9230 $4,869.00 $622.37 $5,491.37 <br />Workman's Comp <br />5645 9445 $40,421.00 $9,174.00 $31,247.00 <br />Purchased Services <br /> <br /> REVENUES <br />5645 6204 $906,538.00 <br /> Social Service Admin. Reimb. <br /> <br />$24,013.71 <br /> <br />$930,551.71 <br /> <br />(F-7) 2000 International Residential Code (2002 Edition) - Appendix G - <br /> <br />Swimming Pools, Spas and Hot Tubs <br /> <br /> Mr. Scott McAnulty, Chief Building Inspector, presented a brief <br />overview of Appendix G of the 2000 International Residential Code (2002 <br />Edition) that regulates the construction of swimming pools, spas and hot tubs <br />for one and two-family residential dwellings. He stated that adoption of <br />Appendix G as a part of the County's building regulations would allow the <br />County's Inspections Division to enforce those standards in Cabarrus County. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Carpenter questioned Mel Murray regarding the proposed <br />swimming pool construction regulations. Mr. Murray brought this issue to the <br />Board's attention at its January 27tn meeting. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mel Murray confirmed that the proposed regulations as presented by <br />Mr. McAnulty would address his concerns. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Carruth, seconded by Commissioner Carpenter <br />and unanimously carried, the Board set a public hearing for 6:30 p.m. (or as <br />soon thereafter as persons my be heard) on Monday, March 17, 2003, for the <br />purpose of considering the adoption of Appendix G (Swimming Pools, Spas and <br />Hot Tubs) of the 2000 International Residential Code (2002 Edition) as a part <br />of the County's Building Regulations. <br /> <br />(F-8) Request by Microtel Inn and Suites for Waiver of Occupancy Tax <br />Penalties <br /> <br /> Ms. Pam Dubois, Finance Director, reported that Microtel Inn and Suites <br />had requested the waiver of penalties totaling $3,594.46 for its October <br />Occupancy Tax report. Also, she requested clarification regarding authority <br />granted in 1997 to the Deputy County Manager/Finance Director to waive <br />penalties up to $400.00. <br /> <br /> There was brief discussion regarding the collection process for the <br />occupancy tax and the penalties associated with the failure to submit the <br />occupancy tax to the County as required by law. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Commissioner Carruth <br />and unanimously carried, the Board denied the request by Microtel Inn and <br />Suites for a waiver of penalties totaling $3,594.46 for its October 2002 <br />Occupancy Tax Report. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Carpenter, seconded by Commissioner Carruth <br />and unanimously carried, the Board granted authority to the Finance Director <br />(rather than the Deputy County Manager) to waive penalties for the <br />hotel/motel occupancy tax up to $400.00. <br /> <br />(F-9) Updated Financial Forecast - 3 Years <br /> <br /> Ms. Pam Dubois, Finance Director, presented updated financial forecasts <br />for FY 2004 and FY 2005 along with a financial forecast for FY 2006. She <br />stated the updated forecasts added revenue of $4.5 million in FY 2004 from <br />the one-half cent local option sales tax proposed for implementation on July <br />1, which is the date the State's one-half cent sales tax is scheduled to <br />sunset. The FY 2005 forecast included $2.5 million in debt seryice for the <br />$25 million jail facility and would also include the results from the <br />revaluation process. Ms. Dubois projected the following shortfalls during the <br />next three budget years: FY 2004 $5.6 million; FY 2005 - $12.5 million; and <br />FY 2006 - $11.5 million. Finally, Ms. Dubois presented graphs showing the <br />widening gap between expenditures and revenues for the County as well as the <br />cities of Concord and Kannapolis. <br /> <br /> Mr. Day reported the financial forecasts hold expenditures to a <br />conservative level with departments submitting budget requests for FY 2004 at <br />the same level or less than FY 2003. He stated the gap between expenditures <br /> <br /> <br />