Laserfiche WebLink
February 17, 2003 Page 45 <br /> <br />Suggested Process for Selectinq a Site <br />After the architectural firm has determined the space <br />requirements for each component of the justice center, potential <br />sites (including those already mentioned) can be identified and <br />evaluated. Evaluations should include costs (e.g., land, site <br />preparation, construction), functionality, ability to phase <br />construction, expansion capability, and social and economic <br />impacts. <br /> <br />The findings would be presented to the Board in a regular <br />meeting. Following that, an open house session could be held to <br />solicit public comment on the various sites under consideration. <br /> <br />The Board would then select a site based on all the information <br />and comments gathered. <br /> <br />Facility Design <br />The architect is familiar with general facility requirements and <br />office layouts, but during the schematic design process, needs <br />the involvement of those who will actually use the facility. Such <br />involvement will lead to a fully functional design that meets the <br />specific needs of the Cabarrus County justice community. <br /> <br />The schematic design process should be overseen by the Board and <br />county manager to ensurW that general parameters of cost and <br />scale are met. <br /> <br />Exterior design should be consistent with immediate surroundings, <br />history and tradition and will be subject to approval by the <br />Board. <br /> <br />The facility must be designed in such a way that it is expandable <br />for a useable life of at least 50 years. It must also be designed <br />so that construction may be phased over a number of years. As <br />already mentioned, jail construction (and perhaps sheriff's <br />office) will begin as soon as possible. Courthouse construction <br />(or expansion), on the other hand, would not begin for another 5 <br />to 10 years. <br /> <br />Funding <br />Financing plans can be developed after cost estimates and phasing <br />plans have been completed. <br /> <br />[D-l(a)] Land Offer from City of Concord <br /> <br /> Mr. Day stated a letter was in the Agenda from Brian Hiatt, Concord <br />City Manager, outlining plans by the Concord City Council to offer property <br />off Corban Avenue for use as a jail. He advised that the City Council has <br />withdrawn the offer and read into the record the following letter from Mr. <br />Hiatt. <br /> <br />February 14, 2003 <br /> <br />Dear John: <br /> <br />The Concord Mayor and Council have heard concerns from some <br />residents in the community regarding City Council's contemplated <br />offer of land off Corban Street. These residents have requested <br />the Council not offer this land to the County. In response to <br />these concerns, Concord will not be offering this site for use as <br />a Sheriff's Department and jail. You are aware of tbe City's <br />demonstrated efforts in developing strong partnerships with its <br />neighborhoods. The Council values these partnerships and does not <br />want the perceptions of this group of residents to undermine the <br />relationships that have been built. <br /> <br />At the same time, the City still feels strongly that it is <br />important to work with the County to keep the Court facilities <br />downtown. The Court system is vital to the economy of downtown <br />Concord like it is in most County seats. This is an economy that <br />has been built over the last 200 years. Add to this the <br />historical significance and tradition which surrounds the <br />downtown/courthouse marriage and you can see the importance of <br />this issue. The struggles of some of the downtowns in North <br />Carolina where the Court facilities have been moved elsewhere <br />document the reasons for this concern. <br /> <br /> <br />