My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2001 05 21
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2001
>
BC 2001 05 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2002 3:46:54 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:06:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
5/21/2001
Board
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
102 <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissione~ Privette, seconded by Vice Chairman Carruth <br />with Commissioners Privette and Suggs, Vice Chairman Carruth and Chairman <br />Fennel voting, for, the Board agreed to appropriate $30,000.00- from <br />Contingency Funds in Fiscal Years 2001 and 2002 for the Kannapolis Train <br />Station project and approved related budget amendments for this funding. <br /> <br />Harrisbur~Area Land Use Plan <br /> <br /> Mr. Jonathan Marshall, Planning Services Director, presented the <br />proposed Harrisburg Area Plan. This document would replace a land use plan <br />adopted by the Town of Harrisburg in 1985 and the Harrisburg Area Land Use <br />Plan adopted by the County in 1991. The proposed Plan was adopted by the <br />Harrisburg Town Council on March 12, 2001 and recommended for adoption by the <br />Cabarrus County Planning and Zoning Commission on April 19, 2001. Mr. <br />Marshall presented background information concerning the Harrisburg area, <br />outlined goals and recommendations for the area and reviewed infrastructure <br />and public facilities issues. Also, he presented the proposed maps showing <br />future land uses for the Harrisburg area. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Freeman returned at 8:12 p.m. 'and was present for the <br />remainder of the meeting~ <br /> <br /> Chairman Fennel opened the meeting for comments from the public <br />concerning the proposed Harrisburg Area Plan. <br /> <br /> A member of the audience questioned the location of a new road that was <br />shown near her home on the future land use map. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marshall explained the land use map shows the general location for <br />an east-west road in the Harrisburg area. However, he pointed out the road <br />is not on any thoroughfare plan at this time and there would be a number of <br />hearing processes prior to finalization of the road location. <br /> <br /> There was no one else present who wished to address the Board <br />concerning the proposed Harrisburg Area Plan, and Chairman Fennel closed the <br />period of time for public comments. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Vice Chairman Carruth, seconded by Chairman Fennel and <br />unanimously carried, the Board adopted the Harrisburg Area Plan as presented <br />by Mr. Marshall. The Plan as adopted by the Board is on file in the Office <br />of the County Manager. <br /> <br />Petition C01-01(R) - Rezonin~ Request b~Ronnie Hinson <br /> <br /> The Board reviewed issues both for and against Petition C01-01(R) by <br />Mr. Ronnie Hinson to rezone property on Flowes Store Road. Arguments <br />outlined in support of the rezoning included the following: (1) the location <br />of the property; (2) significant improvements to be made to the property by <br />Mr. Hinson; (3) the need to surround intersections with businesses and to <br />create enterprise zones; (4) current zoning would allow Mr. Hinson to live on <br />the property and operate his business with none of the buffers and setbacks <br />to protect adjoining property owners; (5) rezoning would provide a transition <br />between the commercial property at the intersection and the residential <br />community on Flowes Store Road; (6) similar rezoning for a CPA office in the <br />Midland area in the past; (7) the business will not create a traffic problem <br />as most of the heating and air conditioning work will be done in the field <br />and not at the facility on Flowes Store Road. Arguments outlined in <br />opposition to the rezoning included the following: (1) the need to encourage <br />the location of businesses on Highway 601 and maintain Flowes Store Road as a <br />residential area; and (2)' detrimental impact on adjacent property, <br />specifically a residence to the south of the property~ There was also <br />discussion about the purpose of the O/LC district, boundaries between <br />residential and commercial zoning districts, recommended approval by both the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission and County Planning staff and a proposal to <br />ask the Planning Department to develop a plan for the Highway 601/Flowes <br />Store Road intersection that would protect the residential development on <br />Flowes Store Road. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Commissioner Freeman <br />with Commissioners Privette, Freeman and Suggs voting for and Chairman Fennel <br />and Vice Chairman Carruth voting against, the Board voted to deny Petition <br />C01-01(R) by Ronnie Hinson to rezone property on Flowes Store Road from <br />Medium Density Residential to Office/Limited Commercial (Special Use). The <br />Findings of Fact as listed by Commissioner Privette were as follows: (1) The <br />rezoning will have an adverse impact ~n adjacent residential properties, <br />especially the house to the south of the property; (2) Some of the proposed <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.