My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 1999 09 20
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
1999
>
BC 1999 09 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2002 3:44:41 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:07:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
9/20/1999
Board
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
298 <br /> <br /> There was brief discussion by the Board regarding the responsibility of <br />the proposed Construction Oversight Committee and the process for the Board's <br />appointment of three members to the Committee. <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Commissioner Casper <br />and unanimously carried, the Board adopted the school construction process as <br />outlined with the change that the County Commission will. ~approve" rather <br />than "provide" funding. The approved process was as follows: <br /> <br />99-00 SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: <br />TWO MIDDLE SCHOOLS AND ONE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL <br />PARTICIPATION PROVIDED BY: <br /> <br />COUNTY COMMISSION <br />1. ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE AS ABLE: <br /> ... Meetings of the Joint Education Committee <br /> ... Visitations to selected school sites submitted by architect <br /> applicants <br /> ... Review of architect finalist presentations <br /> ... Participate in architect interviews <br /> ... Review of 'value engineering' presentations by H.R. Gray <br />2. APPROVE FUNDING FOR: <br /> ... H.R. Gray technical services (existing funds) <br /> ... School site acquisition (existing funds) <br /> ... Architectural services (existing funds) <br /> ... Construction (financed costs) <br /> 3. APPOINT THREE CITIZENS TO THE PROPOSED CITIZENS CONSTRUCTION OVERSIGHT <br /> COMMITTEE <br /> <br />BOARD OF EDUCATION <br />1. ATTEND kN-D PARTICIPATE AS ABLE: <br /> ... Meetings of the Joint Education Committee <br /> ... Visitations to selected schools sites submitted by architect <br /> applicants <br /> ... Review of architect finalist presentations <br /> ... Review of 'value engineering' presentations by H.R. Gray <br />2. INTERVIEW ARCHITECTS SELECTED BY JOINT EDUCATION COMMITTEE <br />3. SELECT AND AWARD CONTRACT(S) TO ARCHITECT(S) <br />4. SELECT VALUE ENGINEERING ITEMS TO INCLUDE IN DESIGN <br />5. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS <br />6. APPOINT THREE CITIZENS TO THE PROPOSED CITIZENS CONSTRUCTION OVERSIGHT <br /> COMMITTEE <br /> <br />JOINT EDUCATION COMMITTEE: <br />Membership: B.O.C. (Barnhart, Privette, & County Manager) <br /> B.O.E. (Lee, Williams, & School Superintendent) <br />1. PURSUE SELECTION OF ARCHITECT(S) AND SCHOOL DESIGNS <br /> ... Architect(s) selection process tied to existing school projects <br /> built in recent years <br /> ... Consideration of how local 'interactive design options' can or can <br /> not be incorporated in designs submitted by architect <br /> applicants <br /> ... Choose which school sites to visit from those submitted by <br /> architect applicants as 'best' examples <br /> ... Review scheduling issues placing weight on ability of architect <br /> applicants to meet needs of county <br /> ... Consider issues of school design, size and site selection <br /> ... Take input from B.O.E., B.O.C., Citizens Oversight Committee and <br /> others <br />2. SELECT ARCHITECTS TO BE INTERVIEWED BY BoO.E. <br />3. REVIEW VALUE ENGINEERING FINDINGS <br />4. OTHER ISSUES AS MAY COME FORWARD <br /> <br />CITIZENS CONSTRUCTION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE <br />Membership: three appointees by the B.O.E. <br /> three appointees by the B.O.C. <br />1. Participate in site visitations of 'best' examples submitted by architect <br /> applicants <br />2. Participate in design review evaluation inclusive of local 'interactive <br /> design options' <br />3. Participate in 'value engineering' review, providing recommendations <br />4. Provide input into 'future' building design and site selection <br /> considerations <br />5. Provide feedback to the B.O.E., B.OoC. and public as required during <br /> process <br />6. Provide a summary report of the process for reference in future projects <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.