December 14, 2021 Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes November 9, 2021 He asked if Mr. Bass was comfortable with the end of the year. Mr. Bass said yes. The Chair said that is not even 45 days really, or do we want to stick with 60 days? The Chair said Lynn cannot hear head shakes. Mr. Charles Paxton said 60 days sounds fine with him. The Chair asked Mr. Jansen if that is something, they are receptive too? Mr. Jansen from the audience said that works; yes. The Chair said note that Mr. Jansen said yes. The Chair thinks we have worked it out and just need to work through the particulars. We have reviewed the evidence and decided that the conditions were met. We had three things, Item 5 and 7 which was the strapping and the landscape on the roadway. The applicant has agreed to handle that within the next 60 days and then the bond which Mr. Koch says we have. That was the other outstanding issue. Mr. Koch said that was mainly to cover the landscaping and the plantings. The Chair said correct. The Chair said Item 1, Site erosion, stabilization, and stormwater conveyance. Ms. Morris alluded that the State is good with the site erosion and that things have moved into stormwater and will be inspected on their timeline. Item 2 - The strapping we have addressed and that it will be handled within the next 60 days and the buffers will be addressed in the next 60 days. The Chair asked if there was any more discussion on these three items. The Chair asked Mr. Jansen, for the record, if he was clear on his direction. Mr. Jansen from the audience said yes, he was. The Chair said the Board will need to consider accepting the as-built landscape plan as the approved landscape plan for the project. Should the Board decide to accept the as-built landscape plan, the Board will need to consider accepting the revised glare study as well since these two documents are directly related. 13