My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
July 12, 2022 PZ Agenda
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
Planning
>
2020
>
July 12, 2022 PZ Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2022 10:47:58 AM
Creation date
7/8/2022 10:45:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
7/12/2022
Board
Parks
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planningand Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />June 14, 2022 <br />Mr. Wong said he spoke with Mr. Jim Farkas, NCDNR,in charge of this area. I talked with him, <br />and we had severaldiscussions and helooked at the code. Mr. Wongbelieves it is in your packet <br />that included some of thediscussion that we had. <br />He said based on the calculation,ifyou are below24 percent,it is considered low density, above <br />that it is high density. High density requires a lot more detention ponds and things like that. In a <br />low density,you have avegetative swell, but you still have to make sure that the flow goes to the <br />vegetative swell,but you will nothave a detention pond. <br />The Chairsaid heis confused. Hesaid in you presentationyou said 7.55 acres but, on your plan, <br />you are showing 5.5acres. He said go to page 19 in your packet. <br />Mr. Corley said the math is more of the question. So, we have taken the difference ofproposed <br />and existing, and we are adding a quarter of acre. He asked if that was correct. <br />The Chair thinks so. <br />Mr. Corley said it does not jive. How in the world are we at 7 percent impervious percentage? He <br />said help himunderstand how tht is even close to possible. <br />Mr. Wong said so,if you look at the calculation,theproposedimpervious is 2.44acres, existing <br />impervious is 2.19, so that give you gives you 0.25 acres. Take that amount, divide by 3.31, <br />which is the total acres minus the impervious. That is the calculation that NCDNR used to <br />calculate whether it is alow density or whether it isahigh density. We discussedthatwithMr. <br />Farkas,and we gave him the numbers and he said yes, your calculation is correct, you areinthe <br />low density,you are below 24 percent.So, the threshold is 24 percent. <br />The Chair said are you saying it is below 24 percent ofthe new impervious or 24 percent of the <br />total impervious? <br />Mr. Wong said the total impervious. <br />The Chair said because you are already over 24 percent impervious for the entire site before you <br />do anything, that is the confusing part. Your existing impervious is 41.6 percent. <br />Mr. Wong said they do not consideraswimming pool as impervious. According to Mr. Farkas, it <br />is a holding. So, all you do is look at the other areas. You are increasing a little bit. <br />The Chair said the County Resident Stormwater expert is not here. <br />Mr. Murray said thisdoesstill haveto go through plan review,andso those drainage issues <br />would have to be dealt with. <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.