Laserfiche WebLink
to immediately stop all activities disturbing or encroaching on the Waterbody Buffer Zone on your <br />property until this matter is resolved. You should also ensure that your activities comply with <br />applicable state and federal laws surrounding the protection of waterbodies and wetlands. <br /> <br />House Construction May Encroach on Waterbody Buffer Zone <br />We were also concerned when you told us that you plan to begin construction on a house on the <br />property in the coming days. On June 12, 2020, you submitted a Zoning Permit Application for the <br />“Arstark Custom Home” project. The application asked you to submit a “Site/Plot Plan” that, in part, <br />indicated the “location and dimensions of any bodies of water or water channels (ponds, streams, <br />swales, etc.).” Your application did not indicate the Lick Branch stream or any other waterbody. The <br />County approved this permit application based on your representations. <br /> <br />Subsequent site visits and surveys you submitted suggested that the planned house would encroach <br />in the “Minimum Building Setback”, also known as the “No Building Buffer Area”. This area extends <br />at least 20 feet from the waterbody buffer zone described above. See CCDO § 4-10(14). Property <br />owners may not construct any buildings or other structures within this area. Further, only “minimal <br />land disturbance” is permitted within this area. Id. “No development, including soil disturbing <br />activities or grading, shall occur within the established buffer area.” § 4-10(6). <br /> <br />Since the King Engineering survey you sent did not indicate the Waterbody Buffer Zone, county staff <br />performed a GIS-based estimate of the zone and overlayed it over the survey. The analysis showed <br />that most of the steel structure and parts of the planned house construction encroached on the <br />buffer. County Attorney Rich Koch notified your attorney at the time, Jim Scarbrough, of our <br />findings on March 19, 2021. In the email, Mr. Koch stated “the County strongly urges your client to <br />hold off on further construction on that property that could violate the buffer and no build zone.” I <br />have attached the email string for your reference. <br /> <br />You explained to Jay and I today that you intend to start construction of the house in the coming <br />days despite the county’s concerns regarding compliance with the Waterbody Buffer Zone. As we <br />explained, the county has cause to believe that this construction will violate the buffer and beginning <br />construction could be a costly mistake. The best way to ensure compliance with the buffer is by <br />obtaining a stamped survey defining the Waterbody Buffer Zone and No Building Buffer Area and <br />showing that the planned construction is outside of these areas. Such survey is required under <br />CCDO § 4-10(3), which states: <br /> <br />The applicant must provide a detailed survey that field verifies the location of all perennial <br />streams, lakes, ponds, impoundments and wetlands on the subject property and within 100 <br />feet of the boundary of the subject property for all proposed plats and site plans. <br /> <br />This survey will then allow you to mark the limits of the buffer on the site in compliance with CCDO § <br />4-10(6). It will also allow you to comply with CCDO § 4-10(7), which requires that the buffer “be <br />shown on all site plans or subdivision plats related to the project submitted for review.” <br /> <br />To prevent construction in the buffer prior to obtaining this survey, Cabarrus County plans to <br />formally revoke the zoning permit for the house next week and issue a Stop Work Order if also <br /> <br />