1October 11,2 022 PZ Agenda TEST

Home Browse Search

manmade buffering and architectural compatibility, so the nonresidential activities are not a nuisance to residential uses. Agency Review Comments Planning Review: Staff Report, Phillip Collins, Senior Planner Cabarrus County Fire Marshal Review: No comments, Jacob Thompson, County Fire Marshal Soil and Water Review: No comments. Tammi Remsburg, Cabarrus County Resource Conservation Manager EMS Review: No comments. Justin Brines, Cabarrus County EMS Director Sheriff’s Office Review: No comments. Ray Gilleland, Cabarrus County Sheriff’s Lieutenant NCDOT Review: We have no opposition to the proposed rezoning, Marc Morgan, NCDOT Cabarrus Health Alliance: Approved. Chrystal Swinger, Cabarrus Health Alliance Midland Planning: The property is located in an area designated for “Neighborhood” uses per the Future Land Use Plan. However, the town did not want to broad brush designate the entire corridor as “Commercial” when they revised the plan a few years ago and leaving some areas designated for “Neighborhood”to give the town more oversite when it comes to commercial rezoning requests. The town prefers to see single family residential uses develop within major subdivisions. Not here and there along a major thoroughfare that we expect will continue to develop commercially in the long run. We do not support the rezoning. Kassie Watts, Midland Planning, Zoning and Subdivision Administrator Land Use Plan Analysis The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Midland Planning Area. The Midland Area Land Use Plan (MALUP) recommends the subject property be developed with limited commercial uses. The MALUP states that the Limited Commercial district is reflective of the existing commercial uses in Midland. These areas shall be of a variety of commercial uses ranging in intensity and will not incorporate residential areas. Large-scale commercial development in these areas should be considered carefully on a case-by-case basis.