Laserfiche WebLink
<br />April 4, 2005 (Work Session) <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />131 <br /> <br />The Board of Commissioners for the County of Cabarrus met for an Agenda <br />Work Session in the Multipurpose Room at the Cabarrus County Governmental <br />Center in Concord, North Carolina on Monday, April 4, 2005, at 3:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Present - Chairman: Carolyn B. Carpenter <br />Vice Chairman: Robert W. Carruth <br />Commissioners: Robert M. Freeman <br />Joni D. Juba <br />Coy C. Privette <br /> <br />Also present were John D. Day, County Manager; Frankie F. Bonds, Clerk <br />to the Board; and Kay Honeycutt, Deputy Clerk to the Board. <br /> <br />Chairman Carpenter called the meeting to order at 3:38 p.m. <br /> <br />vice Chairman Carruth gave the invocation. <br /> <br />Rowan County's Pretrial Release Program <br /> <br />Mr. V. T. \\Buddy" Poplin, Rowan County Pretrial services Coordinator I <br />presented an overview of the "Pretrial Release Programll used since May 2000 <br />to reduce Rowan County's jail population and make it safer for both employees <br />and detainees. Although similar programs exist throughout North Carolina, Mr. <br />Poplin reported Rowan's program is the only one that actually pays the bonds <br />(up to $10,000.00) for inmates that lack the necessary financial resources. <br /> <br />Highlights of the overview included the following: <br /> <br />. The program is not an "instant fix" and will not reduce the <br />inmate population by a large number immediately. <br />. Mr. Poplin'S salary is paid with Criminal Justice Partnership <br />Program (CJPP) grant funds and bonds are paid from the Prisoner's <br />Concession Funds. <br />. The Program is not under the Sheriff's Department. <br />. Approval by the Senior Superior Court Judge and the District <br />Court Judge is required to initiate the program. <br />. Extensive interviews and background checks are performed before <br />inmates are accepted into the program. <br />. 3,591 interviews conducted by Pretrial Services. <br />. 1,720 inmates accepted for the Pretrial Program. <br />. 1,871 inmates rejected by the program. <br />. $897,880.00 - estimated savings for medical services for inmates <br />if they had remained in jail. <br />. $149,523.00 paid to bondsmen. <br />. $33,033.00 reimbursed by detainees to the Pretrial Program. <br />. 162,719 jail free days saved counting days for continued cases. <br /> <br />Mr. Poplin responded to numerous questions about the program. <br />Questions were directed towards the following issues: nature of crimes <br />committed, screening process, number of times the inmate population was above <br />or below jail capacity, daily cost to house an inmate, etc. He reported the <br />Cabarrus County Sheriff's Department already utilizes many of the pretrial <br />release techniques to reduce its inmate population, with the exception of <br />paying an inmate's bond. <br /> <br />Sheriff Brad Riley explained the jail concession funds and reported <br />those funds are returned to the County's general fund. He reported the Rowan <br />County program would not be effective in Cabarrus County because the only <br />people in jail here are those who have committed a serious crime and/or pose <br />a safety or flight risk. Further, he stated in his opinion the program would <br />not be a suitable short-term alternative to building a temporary jail in <br />order to relieve j ail overcrowding. Finally, Sheriff Riley commended the <br />judges, magistrates and law enforcement personnel for effectively working <br />together to manage the jail population in Cabarrus County. <br /> <br />There was a lengthy discussion about the pretrial release program. <br />Issues addressed by the Board included the following: the need to continually <br />reduce the inmate population by 50 to 75 inmates in order to reduce <br />overcrowding; the danger of a citizen being hurt by an inmate released on a <br />County-paid bond; safety of the officers; the need to address the issue of <br />why a person is in jail; the immediate need to address jail overcrowding; and <br />the effectiveness of implementing the program rather than building a <br />temporary jail. It was suggested that the pretrial program, along with <br />others, could be considered in the future to address jail population issues. <br />