Laserfiche WebLink
'450 <br /> <br /> The'Board of Commissioners for the County of Cabarrus met in recessed <br />session at the General Services Building in Concord, North Carolina on Friday, <br />June 16, 1995, at 1:00 P.M. <br /> <br />Present o Chairman: Jeffrey L. Barnhart <br /> Vice-Chairman: Arne L. Fennel <br /> ~ Commissioners: Dr. Franklin C. Niblock, Jr. <br /> Kenneth Olio-Mills <br />Absent - Commissioner: Sue B. Casper <br /> <br /> Also present were Mr. Fletcher L. Hartsell, Jr., County Attorney; Mr. John <br />Day, Budget Officer/Area Manager; Mr. Gerald Newton, Planning and Development <br />Area Manager; Mr. Don Moorhead, Personnel Director; Mr. Henry Waldroup, Utilities <br />Director; and Mrs. Frankie F. Bonds, Clerk to the Board. <br /> <br />Chairman Barnhart called the meeting to order at 1:05 P.M. <br /> <br /> Sheriff Robert Canaday arrived at the meeting for discussion of the <br />proposed budget. Board members agreed that they would not be reviewing the <br />budget at this time; however, they invited Sheriff Canaday to a recessed meeting <br />at 5:00 P.M. on Monday, June 19, for review of the budget. <br /> <br /> Mr. Newton updated the Board on the tree cutting at Lake Concord. The City <br />of Concord has sold two timber deeds at Lake Concord, including a 25-acre tract <br />to the north and a 46-acre tract to the south. The clear cutting on the southern <br />tract is approximately 40 percent complete; however, work has not yet started on <br />the northern tract. According to Mr. Newton, the timber deeds may be bought at <br />a cost of $165,000.00 for the southern tract and $94,000.00 for the northern <br />site. In order to utilize the southern site, Mr. Newton presented a preliminary <br />drawing showing the possible placement of athletic fields in the area that has <br />been clear cut if the soil is suitable for this purpose. Passive recreational <br />activities, including a campground, are planned for the northern site. <br /> <br /> Board members expressed concern about the impact of the tree cutting on the <br />County's intent to build a park at Lake Concord. A meeting has been scheduled <br />for 9:00 A.M. on Monday to discuss this issue with City officials. There was <br />general consensus that the City should repurchase the timber deeds, specifically <br />the deed for the northern 25-acre tract. <br /> <br /> The Board also discussed Draft No. 5 of the proposed Asset Purchase <br />Agreement and the indemnification provisions of the Agreement. Specific issues <br />of discussion concerning the Lake Concord property included security, <br />environmental concerns, the Kannapolis sewer line located on the property, and <br />the safety of the dam. Mr. Waldroup also briefly discussed the use of Lake <br />Concord as an emergency water supply and the declassification of the lake during <br />the next five to seven years. The declassification cannot take place until the <br />State determines that water from Coddle Creek can meet the quantity and quality <br />needs of the citizens. The Board generally agreed that it would work with the <br />City of Concord regarding the declassification process. <br /> <br />Coddle Creek Reservoir <br /> <br /> Mr. Newton reported that a property owner in the Coddle Greek Reservoir <br />area had "inadvertently" cleared one acre of trees in the mitigation area at the <br />Reservoir. He advised that the estimated cost to replace these trees was <br />$50,000.00. There was general consensus that the property owner should be <br />responsible for this expense. <br /> <br /> Mr. Newton reported that Mr. Carl Overcash had constructed an illegal pier <br />at the Reservoir. Mr. Hartsell explained that Mr. Overcash had reserved the <br />right for one pier at the reservoir at the time the County acquired the land by <br />option in 1985. However, since that time, new State restrictions have been <br />enacted which prohibit this type of facility at the Reservoir. It was also noted <br />that Mr. Overcash did not acquire the proper building permits to construct the <br />pier. <br /> <br /> After lengthy discussion, there was general agreement that the County would <br />be willing to assist Mr. Overcash with the application for a variance from the <br />State with the understanding that the pier meets all Code requirements and he <br />follows procedures to get a provisional permit. If the pier does not meet Code <br /> <br /> <br />