Laserfiche WebLink
Coborrus County Transit System <br />Joint Multiple County Systems <br />Finol Report - September 2015 <br />Western Piedmont Regional Transit Authority (WPRTA) is by far the most sophisticated <br />multi- Community Transit collaboration in North Carolina. Many hours of negotiations <br />were involved in getting the Commissioners to sign the Memorandum of Understanding <br />that lays out the financial commitments. Even today new issues arise that weren't <br />anticipated during inception. The complexity of combining multiple funding sources, <br />categorical eligibility criteria, and many social service agencies is perceived as a barrier to <br />coordinated transportation systems. <br />A two county Rowan and Cabarrus union would have the added benefit of a single MPO to <br />serve as an arena for discussing the financial issues, using the FTA Section 5303 and 5307 <br />funds that are awarded to the MPO for this planning /facilitation function. There are several <br />successful two county transit systems in North Carolina. <br />Service Delivery Alternatives Conclusions <br />Any major shift from the existing CCTS in -house operation, which is conveniently housed <br />within the same building occupied by the primary agencies using the services, would be <br />disruptive and would take a couple of years to implement. If any other than a status quo <br />was to be considered, the City- County Consolidation seems like a logical choice based on the <br />collaborative working history of CCTS and CK Rider Transit and the rapidly urbanizing <br />growth of the County. Of the various organizational structure options listed above only the <br />City- County Consolidation has a NCDOT -PTD scope for a planning study to advance <br />regionalization. <br />9.4 A BROAD RANGE OF POSSIBLE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVES <br />Given the reduction in service area, potential loss of the ADA contract, limited focus on <br />general public transportation needs and low performance indicators of the existing transit <br />operations, there was a need to study multiple layers of alternatives will largely to <br />maintain CCTS at the current fleet and staffing level: <br />• Make current delivery more efficient — i.e. coordinated medical trips <br />• Take full advantage of the growing urban transit services — i.e. CCTS feeder service <br />• Add any reportable trips that can be provided at low cost — i.e. seats available, <br />volunteer driver / vanpool <br />A list of the preliminary 22 initiatives with: cost calculation, funding summary and <br />potential funding sources can be found in Appendix C. The narrative of each initiative <br />follows. <br />Out of County Medical Trip Coordination — with Added Transit Access for Commuters <br />Out -of- County medical transportation consumes between 8 -10% of the revenues of the <br />Community Transit Systems in this region. An effective strategy employed by Cabarrus, <br />Attachment number 1 \n <br />F -3 Page 153 <br />