My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2015 12 14
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2015
>
AG 2015 12 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2015 4:02:00 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 10:40:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/14/2015
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Coborrus County Transit System <br />Joint Multiple County Systems <br />Finol Report - September 2015 <br />Western Piedmont Regional Transit Authority (WPRTA) is by far the most sophisticated <br />multi- Community Transit collaboration in North Carolina. Many hours of negotiations <br />were involved in getting the Commissioners to sign the Memorandum of Understanding <br />that lays out the financial commitments. Even today new issues arise that weren't <br />anticipated during inception. The complexity of combining multiple funding sources, <br />categorical eligibility criteria, and many social service agencies is perceived as a barrier to <br />coordinated transportation systems. <br />A two county Rowan and Cabarrus union would have the added benefit of a single MPO to <br />serve as an arena for discussing the financial issues, using the FTA Section 5303 and 5307 <br />funds that are awarded to the MPO for this planning /facilitation function. There are several <br />successful two county transit systems in North Carolina. <br />Service Delivery Alternatives Conclusions <br />Any major shift from the existing CCTS in -house operation, which is conveniently housed <br />within the same building occupied by the primary agencies using the services, would be <br />disruptive and would take a couple of years to implement. If any other than a status quo <br />was to be considered, the City- County Consolidation seems like a logical choice based on the <br />collaborative working history of CCTS and CK Rider Transit and the rapidly urbanizing <br />growth of the County. Of the various organizational structure options listed above only the <br />City- County Consolidation has a NCDOT -PTD scope for a planning study to advance <br />regionalization. <br />9.4 A BROAD RANGE OF POSSIBLE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVES <br />Given the reduction in service area, potential loss of the ADA contract, limited focus on <br />general public transportation needs and low performance indicators of the existing transit <br />operations, there was a need to study multiple layers of alternatives will largely to <br />maintain CCTS at the current fleet and staffing level: <br />• Make current delivery more efficient — i.e. coordinated medical trips <br />• Take full advantage of the growing urban transit services — i.e. CCTS feeder service <br />• Add any reportable trips that can be provided at low cost — i.e. seats available, <br />volunteer driver / vanpool <br />A list of the preliminary 22 initiatives with: cost calculation, funding summary and <br />potential funding sources can be found in Appendix C. The narrative of each initiative <br />follows. <br />Out of County Medical Trip Coordination — with Added Transit Access for Commuters <br />Out -of- County medical transportation consumes between 8 -10% of the revenues of the <br />Community Transit Systems in this region. An effective strategy employed by Cabarrus, <br />Attachment number 1 \n <br />F -3 Page 153 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.