My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2015 12 14
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2015
>
AG 2015 12 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2015 4:02:00 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 10:40:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/14/2015
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Coborrus County Transportation Services (CCTS) Finol Report — September 2015 <br />contract is lost therefore no revenue is programmed for ADA contract in years 2017 -2020. <br />The County Manager has been alerted that CK Rider Transit has issued a call for 5310 <br />applications. The County has been advised that only projects contained in the Locally <br />Coordinated Human Service / Public Transportation Plan (LCP) are eligible for funding. <br />The CTSP recommended that a new coordination summit be organized immediately to <br />capture this opportunity. The plan also includes funding for a full blown LCP in year 2019 <br />the next CTSP to be done in 2020. <br />MARKETING RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The plan calls for $3,000 to be spent on promoting the new initiatives, in addition to the <br />$7,000 per year that CCTS spends on marketing. <br />The recommendation to employ a Mobility Manager using rural 5310 funding — is <br />principally designed around identifying and promoting new markets to utilize 5310 rural <br />funding. Through the study process staff expressed the opinion that there was not enough <br />of a market for RGP and 5310 trip making, hence the return of $22,000 in RGP funds last <br />year and the decision not to accept the 5310 funding in FY15. This perception needs to be <br />dispelled via an aggressive campaign launched by a mobility manager, who is trained to <br />find and deliver rural transit opportunities. <br />DYNAMIC FINANCIAL PLAN AND BUDGET TOOL <br />The following assumptions have been incorporated into the financial plan and digital budget tool: <br />• Projected federal, state and local grant funding assistance programs, (5311, 5310, ROAP, etc) <br />per CTSP project recommendations. Each CTSP project recommendation has been clearly <br />defined by specific funding splits (Federal, State and Local). Note also the recommendation <br />to leverage 5310 funding at the 80/20 split level rather than the 50/50 split used in the past. <br />• Time was allocated while on -site for the final steering committee meeting, to allow the <br />Transportation Manager to familiarize himself with the budget tool. This is done so he can <br />update any future budget changes in funding levels, service priorities, or other factors that <br />could affect the transit system funding needs. <br />• The dynamic model required the use of "G" coded expended line item expense, revenue and <br />capital budgets as bases provided by transit agency for developing 3 year trend and base case <br />funding scenarios and fully allocated cost model. The OpStats were not be used as the <br />financial model base line data source. <br />CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN <br />The current fleet of vehicles would be replaced on a useful life replacement schedule over the five- <br />year period but no expansion vehicles would be sought. The schedule is to have three vehicles <br />Attachment number 1 \n <br />F -3 Page 202 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.