My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2015 12 14
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2015
>
AG 2015 12 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2015 4:02:00 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 10:40:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/14/2015
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Coborrus County Transportation Services Final Report - September 2015 <br />3.4 FINANCIAL /ASSESSMENT <br />A summary of revenues and expenses for FY 2012 through FY 2014 from the OPSTATS <br />reports are listed in Table 4. CCTS has had a balanced budget for the past three fiscal <br />years. CCTS does not have a reserve budget, and therefore does not have reserve funding <br />to implement new or expanded services, or to meet the minimum recommendation of 3 <br />months of reserves in the event of any loss in funding. Funding sources will need to be <br />identified to implement any CTSP recommendations that include new or expanded services. <br />Table 4: CCTS Revenues and Expenses Summary (FY 2012 -2014) <br />Year A[Revenues Expenses Surplus <br />6: jjk(Deficit) <br />2012 $1,516,424 $1,516,424 $0 <br />2013 $1,428,268 $1,428,268 $0 <br />2014 $1,434,027 $1,434,027 $0 <br />Source: OPSTATS Reports for 2012, 2013, and 2014 <br />There have been fluctuations in the funding CCTS received from various sources over the <br />past three years. Due to decreases in the number of RGP trips over the past two years, <br />CCTS has not requested its full allocation of ROAP funding from the state. CCTS has <br />stated that this was due to difficulties with passengers meeting eligibility requirements for <br />rural to urban trips. This issue was discussed at Steering Committee meetings for the <br />CTSP. As of the writing of this report CCTS had not anticipated using the FY15 5310 <br />funds for the elderly and disabled, because they anticipated the market for these services <br />from the dwindling rural areas was not there. <br />During the initial scoping meeting for this CTSP, CCTS expressed concern about the <br />pending Medicaid brokerage procedures that were scheduled to go into effect on Julyl, <br />2014. North Carolina has been considering implementation of a brokerage system to <br />administer their non - emergency medical transportation program. However, North Carolina <br />has used a coordinated model of public and human service transportation for over 30 years <br />and implementation of a brokerage system for Medicaid transportation may have negative <br />impacts on this coordinated transportation model. According to a Department of Health <br />and Human Services report to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committees on Health and <br />Human Services and Transportation entitled Non - Emergency Medical Transportation <br />Services Management Report (October 2012), potential impacts include loss of efficiency, <br />increased cost for other trips, fragmentation of service, and reduction in service quality. <br />CCTS is specifically concerned about the loss of a large percentage of their trips and <br />associated revenue. The Medicaid brokerage procedures did not go into effect in July 2014 <br />and, as of this writing, there is no current schedule for implementation. <br />Attachment number 1 \n <br />F -3 Page 106 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.