Laserfiche WebLink
ADVOCACY <br />SECTION 3.OTHER LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION <br />ENVIRONMENT <br />CONDEMNATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENTS - S600, sponsored by Sen. Dan Clodfelter (Mecklenburg), as originally intro- <br />duced would have required public condemners to demonstrate there is no "prudent and feasible alternative" to condemnation of property <br />in a conservation easement in all cases, and a judge would determine. The Association worked with the bill sponsors and other interest- <br />ed public groups to negotiate exceptions for such issues as water and sewer systems, greenways, and other situations in which the land <br />can be restored closely to its original state. S600 was ratified July 30 and signed by the governor Aug. 8. <br />PROMOTE MITIGATION BANKS - S755, sponsored by Sen. Clodfelter, as originally introduced would have required that com- <br />pensatory mitigation for riparian buffer loss would have to be satisfied by participation in a private mitigation bank instead of the State's <br />Eco-system Enhancement Program, unless an application could show that there was no private bank available. The NC Department of <br />Transportation was exempted from this requirement; the NCACC successfully worked with the bill sponsor to get the same exemption for <br />counties. S755 was ratified July 15 and signed by the governor July 24. <br />WATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE - H945, the 2009 studies bill, creates a joint legislative study commission on water and <br />wastewater infrastructure. The study commission includes as a member the Executive Director of the NCACC. Details of the study are in <br />Sections 43.1 - 43.5 of the bill. The study commission is required to make an interim report during the 2010 Short Session and its final <br />report in 2011. <br />AMEND ELECTRONICS RECYCLING LAW - S877, sponsored by Sen. Don Vaughan (Guilford), originally sought technical changes <br />to the existing laws related to the implementation of state computer recycling policies. During the course of the session, the Association <br />entered into conversations with computer manufacturers and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources to substantially <br />revise the program to help counties that may need assistance in establishing a computer recycling program. During the final days of the <br />session tentative agreements were made on a framework that would collect registration fees from computer manufacturers and then <br />those fees would be used as grants to counties to create a computer recycling program. Ultimately, legislation passed to extend the ef- <br />fective date from Jan. 1, 2010, until July 1, 2010, giving time during the interim to finalize the details of the agreement. <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS <br />EMINENT DOMAIN - H1268, sponsored by Rep. Dan Blue (Wake), recommended an amendment to the North Carolina Constitution <br />by referendum that would prohibit a county from using eminent domain to take property and give it to another for economic development. <br />Additionally, it would give property owners the authority to ask for trial by jury to determine compensation for land seized through eminent <br />domain. H1268 did not pass this session but remains eligible during the 2010 Session. <br />LOCAL GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIMS ACT - S1026, sponsored by Sen. Tony Rand (Cumberland), would have waived immunity <br />for local governments in all cases (allows jury trial) and broadly redefined proprietary functions to widen services for which local gov- <br />ernments can be held liable. This bill would have eliminated a county's ability to waive governmental immunity through the purchase of <br />liability insurance. S1026 did not pass this session. <br />OPEN GOVERNMENT ACT - H1134, introduced by Rep. Deborah Ross (Wake), was approved by the House on July 13 and re- <br />mains pending in the Senate. The bill would do two things. It would amend the state's Public Records Law to make it easier for one who <br />successfully compels disclosure of public records in a legal action to recover attorneys' fees if the plaintiff "substantially prevails" in the <br />action. Attorneys' fees would not be awarded if the governmental body relied on an attorney general's opinion, a published opinion of <br />an appellate court or a court order. Reliance on the governmental body's own attorney would not provide protection from assessment of <br />attorneys' fees. The bill would also create an "open government unit' in the State Attorney General's Office, to be supported by fees, that <br />would implement "education and awareness programs" relating to public records and open meetings laws, "serve as a moderator or me- <br />diator in resolving public records and open meetings issues," "assemble and maintain a collection of relevant state laws, opinions, rules, <br />and regulations related to public records and open meetings laws," and "adopt and develop policies and procedures as may be neces- <br />sary to accomplish these functions." <br />G-4 Page 144 <br />