My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2005 04 18
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2005
>
AG 2005 04 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2006 8:34:52 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:35:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
4/18/2005
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />11 <br /> <br />those schools want even scratch the surface of taking care of this and these <br />other subdivisions. The Chair said it is a pretty plan, it's pretty clear and it says <br />it all. <br /> <br />Mr. Griffin said do we know anything about the build out rate for Moss Creek? <br /> <br />Mr. Lentz said as he ,understood from the developer that was like a ten year <br />project. <br /> <br />The Chair asked what is the build out rate of this project. <br /> <br />Mr. Killian said based on the absorption at Heather Stone what they are doing is <br />about four to five a month roughly fifty a year, three hundred units about six <br />years for this project. <br /> <br />, <br />Mr. Moore said if we !as a panel charged with the responsibility of meeting the <br />needs of the citizens, of the county as well asthqse people who wish to do <br />business in this county see a problem, not with' a given project, but with an <br />overall area. Do we hot have the authority to try to lessen that problem or at <br />least not acerbate it by adding t~ the prob~", <br /> <br />Mr. Koch said he doe~ not thin:--d'~ance is written in such a way that it <br />allows the Board to Idok at one ~I~~plications for preliminary subdivision <br />approval in the pverall context of what else is happening in that area uniess it is <br />something that woulO fall generally under the adequate facilities ordinance <br />aspect of it. He said from the reading of the ordinance you can see that when <br />they are looking at the ordinance and determining what they have to do to <br />comply with it the way the ordinance is written, they are to look at it only in a <br />context of what theiq proposed subdivision adds, not what it adds along with <br />everything else that n'laybe out there on the horizon. Mr. Koch said to answer <br />Mr. Moore's question !specifically he would have to advice him to look at their <br />application in view of! whether it has meet the requirements of the ordinance. <br />He said you cannot I<~ok at it in an overall context of the general good of the <br />county. Mr. Koch sailll that would not be a good idea because the ordinance is <br />not written that way. ' He said until it is he will have to instruct the Board that <br />they would have to lo~k at it in that more limited sense. <br /> <br />The Chair said he feel~ like this project is not anywhere near filling the adequate <br />facilities ordinance. He said it is because of the statement from the school board <br />about this project. ., <br /> <br />Ms. Burns said to Mr.iKoch does Mr. Kluttz's memorandum indicate to him that <br />there would be a problem meeting the adequate facilities ordinance. <br /> <br />E-.\ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.