Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Town Center <br />Goal- To establish I Town Center that combines a mix of uses, creates a walkable <br />environment and showcases the charm and character that is representative of the <br />Midland plan area. <br /> <br />The concept of a Town Center was discussed at length during the citizen-input phase of <br />the land use planning process. In all, three (3) potential sites were discussed. The first <br />option centered around the traditional downtown Midland, often referred to as "Old <br />Midland". The second site made use of the existing Bethel School and included several <br />large vacant tracts adjacent to the school site. The last option featured what is often <br />referred to as the crossroads, the intersection of NC 24/27 and US Hwy 601. In the end it <br />was decided that Old Midland was not an appropriate option due to its lack of vacant land <br />and more importantly, lack of adequate access. The remaining sites were both <br />considered appropriate but the crossroads site was favored. It was decided that both <br />areas could supþort some type of mixed-use development with emphasis on the <br />crossroads location for civic uses. Social services may be an acceptable use for the <br />location at the existing Bethel School in addition to a variety of other commercial and <br />residential uses. <br /> <br />Recommendation- Approve the proposed Midland Area Land Use plan which includes mixed- <br />use designations that support a Town Center style development in the areas that have been <br />deemed appropriate (see Map 9, Future Land Use). Create a Planned Unit Development <br />(PUD) district that will promote the orderly development of mixed use projects in. t~e Midland <br />and County Ordinances. <br /> <br />Design Standards <br />Goal- To protect and enhance the rural character of the Midland plan area. <br /> <br />Throughout the citizen-input phase of the land use planning process residents expressed <br />concerns about the quality of development being constructed within the plan area. Many <br />residents expressed concerns that new development might make NC 24/27 look similar <br />to Independence Boulevard in Charlotte that is characterized by large neon signs, <br />multiple access points, and lack of visual appeal. There was also concern that existing <br />structures would bè razed and historical significance would be lost. Architectural design <br />guidelines can de drafted to prescribe certain desired features including roof types, <br />building materials, façade details and scale. These features can enhance the existing <br />character of the Town in areas where desired and appropriate. <br /> <br />G-4 <br /> <br />25 <br />