Laserfiche WebLink
Memorandum <br />Page 2 <br />April 3, 2002 <br /> <br />maintain current services to children who are receiving assistance. Each county should <br />not exceed 100% in combined DCD Subsidy and Smart Start spending for the rest of the <br />state fiscal year. Please remember to spend Smart Start funds before spending DCD <br />Subsidy funds, since federal subsidy funds can be carded into the next state fiscal year, <br />.but Smart Start funds cannot. <br /> <br />Allocation Projection Process for the 2002-2003 State Fiscal Year <br />Many of you have requested information about the decrease in your projected allocation <br />for next year. Analysis of the allocation projections for next year indicated that 65 <br />counties received an increase in their allocation as compared to the current state Fiscal <br />Year, 32 received a decrease in the al!oeation amount and'3 'remained the same. The <br />following explanation is provided regarding the decreases in projected allocation <br />amounts. <br /> <br />Child care allocations are prepared using the three step process that includes a hold <br />harmless factor, allocating the non-c~itegorical funds (CCDF, SSBG and state <br />approPriations) according to the poverty and demographic factors described in legislation <br />and allocating the categorical funds (TANF and TANF MOE) based on a county's <br />expenditures on employment in the previous State Fiscal Year. Note that the allocation <br />of the categorical funds is not determined by legislative language which has allowed the <br />Division flexibility in allocating these funds in past years based on the 'availability of new <br />federal funds, and county spending patterns." For the last two years, the categorical funds <br />were allocated according to the county's total expenditure level, not just employment <br />expenditures. This was done t(~ help counties maintain the levels of spending they were <br />able to achieve through the reallocation process. This was possible because new federal <br />funds were available to the state. <br /> <br />For the 2002 - 2003 year, the Division was unable to continue to use this option, as there <br />was very little new funding available. While Congress did increase the funding level of <br />the CCDF in December, North Carolina's share of the increase is $2.7 million for subsidy <br />services.. At the time the new projections were due, the Division did not have the final <br />grant award and was unable to include the increase'in CCDF funds in the projections for <br />next year. <br /> <br />Impact of Change in Allocation Process and Efforts to Address <br />The decreases in allocation amounts for counties range from 32% to 1%. Many of you <br />have contacted the Division to ask whether additional funds will be available. This issue <br />was discussed at the March meeting 0fthe North Carolina Association of County <br />Directors of Social Services Day Care Committee meeting and at the Executive <br /> <br /> <br />