Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes <br />May t8, 2000 <br /> <br />Page 2"; <br /> <br />Mr. Byrd said it is the same principal as cell tower being allowed in LDR. He said <br />if it is a permitted use without any special requirements attached to it, such as a <br />special use, it is the same principal. <br /> <br />Mr. Moose said if people live in multi-family houses and they have children, they <br />have to use a school. He said this board for the last year has been fighting over <br />adequate facilities. He asked Mr. Byrd if he is telling the Board now that they <br />can walk in and just get it done without even coming before the Board and <br />without meeting any of the criteria of the adequate facilities ordinance. IVfr. <br />Moose said that is wrong. <br /> <br />Mr. Byrd said yes they can walk in without coming before the Board. He said it <br />is a permitted use. The utilities not being available, which is the situation he is <br />talking about now, has practically eliminated that type of development in our <br />jurisdiction at this point. Mr. Byrd said that is a limitation to any kind of <br />development like this because it is the matter of the availability of the services <br />needed to do that type of development. <br /> <br />Hr. Newton said being a special use, if there are conditions that the Board would <br />think that are appropriate, they can be imposed. He said he would like to point <br />out that the requesl: here is consistent with the area plan, it is timely, and it is <br />not premature. He said he has heard that said twice about it being premature <br />and wait for a year or two to see where things are. Mr. Newton said if the Board <br />feels that the adequate facilities ordinance does not permit certain things to <br />occur right now, whether it happens today or next month or a year from now, it <br />is immaterial it does not change how that property can occur and be developed. <br />What changes is you would not be in a position to have multi-family in a <br />cohesive clustered nature setting 300 feet back from the road. He said if this <br />does not happen through a controlled special use rezoning it can still happen. <br />Mr. Newton said this board, he thinks two years ago, went through and changed <br />through a text amendment the maximum dwelling units that could occur in the <br />limited commercial which was set at 18 dwelling units to the acre down to the 8. <br />He said the packet better explains how it complies with the area plan, improves <br />the utility situation at the intersection area, and gives you control of the <br />development of that site. <br /> <br />Mr. David Bigford, Applicant, addressed the Board stating he and his brother run <br />Bigford Enterprise. He then explained to the Board what he wanted to do with <br />this property. Hr. Bigford said to the Board that they are willing to work with the <br />8 units per acre. He said they thought if they could buy one big piece of land <br /> <br /> <br />