My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2000 10 16
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2000
>
AG 2000 10 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 4:59:38 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:47:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
10/16/2000
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11, 3.3.2.1 - This section allows anyone, even someone who does not own your land and is not in a <br /> position of§ovemance to seek a rezonin§ of someone else's property. That means that an upset <br /> neishbor could seek to rezone their neighbor or a man across town's propmy. This seems very wrong. <br /> <br />Case law shows that we must have some type of mechanism for this. Staff recommends that <br />this section be amended to require that a person can approach the Planning Commission <br />and must secure their sponsorship of the application for a third party rezuning request to <br />proceed. <br /> <br />12. 3.3.2.2 - while a neighborhood meetings are very good ideas, I don't believe that the government <br /> should require you to meet with your neighbors before submitting for your own properties rezoning. <br /> <br />Staff feels that these meetings can help achieve superior development proposals and make <br />the public hearing process move ahead more smoothly. These are working successfully in <br />Kannapolis. This is a policy decision that the Board of Commissioners should discuss. <br /> <br />13. 3.3.3.1 - If anyone can ask for a text amendment, how do the affected find out? <br /> <br /> · Through legal advertisements and public hearing. If the result is a down zoning of <br /> particular properties than those parties must be notified as required by <br /> <br />14. (This is the same question as above.) <br /> <br />15. 3.3.6 - Does the County have protest petitions? <br /> <br />· General Statues does not require them for the County. <br /> <br />16. May a rezoning be converted between Planning Board action and City Council/County Commission <br /> hearing from a straight rezoning to a conditional rezoning? <br /> <br />· Yes, so long as the result does not increase the intensity of the original application heard by <br /> the Planning Board or advertised to the public. <br /> <br />17. 3.5 - It seems excessive to require conditional use permits to have to go to both Board of Adjustmant <br /> and city council/county commission. Especially when you look at how many uses are placed as <br /> conditional under the use table. <br /> <br />In most cases, the Planning Commission will make the final decision on Conditional Use <br />Permits. Text amendments will be made to the County Commission to clarify who will make <br />each type of decision. However, the County Commission could be asked to make a final <br />determination on a Conditional Use application if a decision of the Planning Commission is <br />appealed. <br /> <br />18. 3.6.2.1 - Does ~i_s_ mean that straight rezonings can not go through an expedited rezoning? <br /> <br />· It is recommended that the County continue to process rezonings through an expedited <br /> process. Other jurisdictions may not use this method. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.