Laserfiche WebLink
02/22/99 11:49 FAX 17044249895 I~ANE CHARL0'IT~ ~011/021 <br /> <br />Cabarrus County <br /> <br />Year 2000 Readiness Audit Proposal <br /> <br />- Key Pcrsormcl <br />- Enterprise Portfolio <br />- Business Praet{ccs <br /> <br />- Tcc~ic~ ~s~c~ ~d Con~ots <br />- ~ysis, ~mc~a~o~ Tes~ng, ~d Compli~cc. <br /> <br /> AppUe~fion level questions that will confirm the validity of the decisions and processes ~ed <br /> application compliart¢c. These qu~stlons are grouped into the following seotions; <br /> <br /> - Enterprise Level <br /> - ~,n~lysis <br /> Rmncdiation and Unit Testing. <br />e Confi~ursiion Management questions that will verify that the correct code is being modified, <br /> tested and placed into production after remediation and that "Clean Management" processes are in <br /> place to prevent future corruption. <br /> <br /> Testing sad Quality Assursmce questions that will confirm the validity of the decisions and <br /> processes used £or te~ting the remed;ated and alrcudy-compliaut applications. These qucstiolls will <br /> ensure that thc agreed-upon definitions of compliance are confirmed for each application and t'or the <br /> enterprise as a whole. These questions arc grouped into the i'ollowing sections: <br /> <br /> - Enterprise Level <br /> - Quality Assurance <br /> Risk A~alysis for ApplicationsAlpgrade Projects <br /> - Upgrade Unit/Application Tcsling. <br /> <br /> Training questions that will verify that thc team has been appropriately trained in order to remedlate <br /> and unit test thc code changes most efficiently and effectively. <br /> <br />Some questions are duplicated from section to section because thc people interviewed will bc different <br />for eaoh sccilon. As a rcsult, wc will bc able to get a complete picture of Lhe slate of the project and will <br />be able to generate a complete and comprehensive audit report. <br /> <br />5.1.4 AUDIT REPORT <br /> <br />The audit report will document the entire audit process and will contain ~n~n~ information aubh aa: <br /> <br />· Effectiveness o£m~-~glng the Year 2000 process and an assessment of thc resources cl~voted to the <br /> project <br /> <br />· Assessment of plans, activities and results related to non-application software issues, including: non- <br /> IT assets, Supply Chain, IT Infi:astructure, Embedded Systems, £1ectr~ic Trading Partners (sec <br /> Secfon 2.3 above) <br /> <br />· Validity of thc plans to idcntify, ~orrcct, test, and implement thc upgrades for Year 2000 processing <br /> <br />· Assessment of the date rmmipulation strategics s~lect=d for iu-housc applications <br /> <br />· Status of the plan and capabiiR7 to complete the necessary changes with testing well underway for <br /> mission-critical appl/oafions by December 31, 1998 <br /> <br />· Effectiveness in coordinating Year 2000 processing capabilit/es w/th the hardware and software <br /> vendors <br /> <br />Proprietary and Confidential <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />02/22/99 <br /> <br /> <br />