Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes <br />January 21~ 1993 <br /> <br />Paqe 9 <br /> <br />3. That employment areas be oriented towards and have <br />direct access to U.S. 29. <br /> <br />4. That development be buffered and/or screened from <br />areas of dissimilar development. <br /> <br />5. That extensions of public water and sewer be required <br />where development type and intensity warrants. And we <br />would determine that any employment type use and medium <br />density residential would require that public water and <br />sewer extension. <br /> <br />6. That right-of-way dedication for the Westside Bypass <br />be supported for any major development along the proposed <br />route. <br /> <br />Mr. Marshall said this is a special use rezoning. As <br />part of that if the rezoning were to be approved, the <br />submitted concept plan would become part of the zoning by <br />deed restrictions. The developers notes as submitted <br />would also become part of that plan. Any additional <br />conditions that may be placed as part of the rezoning <br />process would have to be agreed to by the petitioner to <br />be valid and binding on this rezoning if approved. Mr. <br />Marshall said the staff recommends approval of Parcel A <br />because it is consistent with both the plan and current <br />development. Parcel B, the staff recommends approval <br />with some conditions being placed on it that would reduce <br />the size. Parcel C and D, the staff recommends approval <br />of that light industrial special use. <br /> <br />Mr. Bob Bradshaw, Representing Propst Family, addressed <br />the Board stating they have had numerous meetings with <br />the staff and they have been very cooperative. On <br />January 6, 1993, they held a meeting inviting adjoining <br />property owners. Throughout the process, they feel they <br />made every effort, not only to be consistent with the <br />Western Area Plan and to respond to staff comments, but <br />also to the reasonable requests of neighbors with respect <br />to certain portions of the plan. They think they have <br />achieved that goal. Mr. Bradshaw said he would like to <br />make some general points about this rezoning. First, <br />this property needs to be rezoned because this area has <br />changed. Second, the size of the tract that is involved. <br />He thinks that in the land use regulation area, size <br />affords you additional opportunity and additional <br />assurance of quality development. Also there is a <br />significant economic pressure on the single owner of a <br />large tract of land presented for mixed use development, <br /> <br /> <br />