My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG19911021
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1991
>
AG19911021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2003 9:14:52 AM
Creation date
11/27/2017 12:04:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
10/21/1991
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PlanninG and Zoning Commission ~4inutes <br />September 19~ 1991 , P~pe 10 <br /> <br />3. Applicant: Cotter Communications~ Petitioner <br /> Steve & Janice Hudspeth{ Owners <br /> Request: Rezoninq of Property from ARR to O-I/SU <br /> <br /> This was a request to the Cabarrus County Planning and <br /> Zoning Commission from Cotter Communications, Petitioner <br /> and Steve & Janice Hudspeth, ~ners to have their <br /> property located on Hudspeth Road, rezoned from ARR to O- <br /> I/SU, to allow an office/warehouse building for a public <br /> relations firm. <br /> <br /> Jonathan B. Marshall, Staff Member, presented the Staff <br /> Analysis to the Board stating this is a special use <br /> request, and as such, reasonable conditions may be <br /> attached as part of this rezoning with the specific uses <br /> being requested as part of this rezoning. Those pending <br /> conditions that may be attached would have to done with <br /> the consent of the petitioner. Mr. Marshall asked the <br /> Board to consider, if not addressed by the petitioner, <br /> conditions that would address parking, landscaping and <br /> buffering, should this petition be approved. <br /> <br /> Mr. Olio-Mills asked Mr. Marshall if he had reviewed the <br /> site plan, and if he is prepared to make a recommendation <br /> to the Board. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marshall stated since this is a staff review in which <br /> the recommendations are formulated, he would be hesitant <br /> to make a recommendation by himself. <br /> <br /> Chairperson stated to Mr. Marshall she understood this <br /> area is quite a mixed use area for the Charlotte Motor <br /> Speedway and she is not overly concerned about <br /> maintaining it as ARR. She also stated she disliked <br /> using the work "spot zoning", because it is overused and <br /> misunderstood, but are there other office/institutional <br /> uses around, or does he perceive that as a legal problem? <br /> <br /> Mr. Marshall stated he does not perceive it as a problem <br /> due to the fact that it is a special use and factors that <br /> can directly address this particular use can be brought <br /> up in this hearing. The office/institutional zoning in <br /> the larger sense is a transition zoning that ~s used for <br /> areas that have gone through the type of development this <br /> has. Where new residential uses are not coming into <br /> place, but rather non-residential uses are. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.