BC 1983 03 03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

249 Mr. Manuel Kiser objected to Mr. Jack Rankin's recommending the deferral of the proposed amendment, stating it was his duty as Planning Board Chairman to present only those recommendations approved by the Planning Board. UPON MOTION of Commissioner Payne, seconded by Commissioner Lentz with CommissionersPayne and Lentz and Chairman Nash voting for and Commissioners Milloway and Barnhardt voting against, the Board tabled action of proposed Zoning Text Amendment (2) and sent the matter back to the Planning Board for recommendations to take care of landlocked property and to have some protection in this area. The substitute motion by Commissioner Barnhardt and seconded by Commissioner Milloway to approve the proposed amendment to exempt the word "exclusive" from Section 4.8 and to recommend that the Planning Board look further into the problem of landlocked property failed with Commissioners Barnhardt and Milloway voting for and Commissioners Lentz and Payne and Chairman Nash voting against. (3) Page 75 Section 5.16 Number (2) Amend this section to read: Roofing. The roofing material must be compatible with residential construction within the area in which it is to be located. The roof pitch shall be a minimum of 3/12. Minimum width of eaves and/or soffit shall be six (6) inches. Exempt the sentence: "Guttering comparable to that used on con- ventional residential structured types shall be required." from this section. UPON MOTION of Commissioner Milloway, seconded by Commissioner Barnhardt and unanimously carried, the Board adopted the zoning text amendment as presented. Section 5.16 Number (2) on Page 75 as amended reads as follows: Roofing. The roofing material must be compatible with residential construction within the area in which it is to be located. The roof pitch shall be a minimum of 3/12. Minimum width of eaves and/or soffit shall be six (6) inches. (4) Planning Department recommendation for fees to be paid by Mobile Home Park developers. Mr. James Owens, Assistant Planning Director, recommended that the Board of Commissioners establish the same fees for mobile home park developers as are presently required for subdivision developments. These fees are $40.00 for subdivisions with 20 lots or less and for those sub- divisions with more than 20 lots a fee of $40.00 plus $1.00 for each lot over 20. UPON MOTION of Commissioner Payne, seconded by Commissioner Lentz and unanimously carried, the Board tabled action on Mobile Home Park development fees until a regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners. Mrs. Joyce Lambert complained to the Board that she had been unable to obtain a zoning permit from Mr. F. E. Isenhour, Zoning Administrator, which would allow the County building inspectors to permit Duke Power to connect electricity to a mobile home that had been moved onto a 23-acre tract of land. She stated that at one time two mobile homes had been located on her property, but in October, 1982, one of the mobile homes had been sold and removed from the site leaving a permanent porch and foundation. According to Mrs. Lambert, another mobile home had been moved onto the space and an elderly couple was now ready to move into the mobile home as soon as the zoning permit was obtained. Mr. Vernon Lambert also complained about the ruling of the Zoning Administrator at this time. Mr. F. E. Isenhour, Zoning Administrator, advised the Board that in his interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance the location of the second mobile home on the tract was nonconforming. Options now available to the Lamberts as explained by Mr. Isenhour included the deeding of a lot for the location of the second mobile home or an appeal of Mr. Isenhour's decision to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Commissioner Barnhardt strongly objected to Mr. Isenhour's interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance in this matter, stating Mr. Isenhour was acting as a dictator and making laws for Cabarrus County. During discussion of the Lambert's situation, Commissioner Lentz suggested that perhaps the Lamberts