Laserfiche WebLink
310 <br /> <br /> Mr. F. A. Rankin, adjoining property owner to the proposed Coddle Creek <br />Reservoir, expressed concern regarding the provision requiring a 100 foot <br />vegetative buffer to be maintained in its natural state on all property <br />adjoining the reservoir. He objected to the buffer being located on his <br />property and stated in his opinion the 100 foot buffer for the Coddle Creek <br />Reservoir should be located on property owned by the County where possible. <br /> Mr. Robert Dayvault who lives near a floodplain also expressed concern <br />regarding the 100 foot vegetative buffer. <br /> A member of the audience questioned the effective date of the require- <br />ment regarding commercial developments. The County Attorney advised that the <br />requirement would be effective from the point of passage of the proposed <br />amendment. <br /> There being no one else to speak regarding the proposed amendment, the <br />public hearing was closed. <br /> Motion was made by Chairman Lentz and seconded by Commissioner Moss to <br />return the proposed amendment to the Planning staff for more detailed infor- <br />mation concerning the property lines and to get a clear cut definition in <br />regards to land purchase and elevation. No vote was taken on this motion. <br /> UPON SUBSTITUTE MOTION of Commissioner Melvin, seconded by Chairman <br />Lentz and unanimously carried, the Board adopted Petition 88-04 as <br />recommended by the Planning Board and as stated above with the exception of <br />the following Item 3 under Section 3.12-3 which was deleted and referred back <br />to the Planning Board. <br /> <br />(3) A 100 foot vegetative buffer shall be maintained in its natural <br />state on all property adjoining the reservoir, no permanent structures <br />shall be allowed in this buffer area. <br /> <br /> Chairman Lentz stated that this was the day and hour scheduled for a <br />public hearing on the issue of closing a portion of Sand Clay Road and asked <br />if anyone were present who wished to speak for or against the proposed road <br />closing. <br /> Mr. Cecil King spoke in favor of the closing of a portion of Sand Clay <br />Road on behalf of Mr. Tommy Freeman who is an adjoining property owner and <br />petitioner for the road closing. He explained that this section of Sand Clay <br />Road was no longer used by the public and that the State had abandoned this <br />part of the road when Interstate 85 was built. Mr. King informed the Board <br />that Mr. Freeman would like the road closed in order to arrange a land swap <br />agreement to get legal access to Ivey Cline Road. <br /> Mr. William B. Cline spoke against the requested road closing, stating <br />that the 44-foot right of way for Sand Clay Road belongs to the Cline family <br />and Taylor family. He stated it was his understanding from the Department of <br />Transportation that the old right of way for Sand Clay Road would go back to <br />the original land owners. Mr. Cline asked that the Board take no action on <br />the requested closing of Sand Clay Road until the matter is settled as to who <br />owns the land. <br /> There was no one else present to speak for or against the proposed road <br />closing. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Moss, seconded by Commissioner Payne and <br />unanimously carried, the Board tabled the request for the closing of a <br />portion of Sand Clay Road until the rightful owner is decided at which time <br />the matter can come back before the Board. <br /> The Board reviewed the proposal submitted by Wingate Paving Company to <br />pave the parking area at the County Service Garage at a cost of $27,189.00. <br />This proposal had been originally submitted at the Board meeting on December <br />7, 1987, with the following recommendations: (1) Waiver of the requirement <br />for the furnishing of a performance and payment bond; (2) Employment of Law <br />Engineering and Testing Company for $1,000.00 to verify compliance with <br />County specifications as to quality of materials and installation; (3) <br />Withholding of all payment until work is completed and verified by Law <br />Engineering and Testing Company. After discussion, it was the consensus of <br />the Board that the County not employ Law Engineering and Testing Company as <br />recommended and that a 12-month guarantee on the paving project be required <br />from the contractor. <br /> UPON MOTION of Chairman Lentz, seconded by Commissioner Moss and unani- <br />mously carried, the Board waived the requirement for the furnishing of a <br />performance and payment bond and awarded the contract for the paving of the <br />parking area at the County Service Garage to Wingate Paving Company in the <br />amount of $27,189.00 with the stipulation that the County get a 12-month <br />guarantee on the paving work. <br /> <br /> <br />