Laserfiche WebLink
December 15, 2014 (Regular Meeting) Page 2233 <br />Per North Carolina Code NCAC 97C.0111 (8), the agency is required to <br />submit the application to the Board of Commissioners for review. <br />UPON MOTION of Commissioner Shue, seconded by Commissioner Honeycutt <br />and unanimously carried, the Board acknowledged receipt of the SRCAA's FY <br />2015 -16 Community Services Block Grant funding application <br />F -14) Tax Administration - Refund and Release Report - November 2014 <br />Release report contains taxpayers' names, bill numbers, valuations, tax <br />amounts, along with the justifications for releasing the valuation /tax <br />amounts for outstanding levies in accordance with N.C.G.S. 105 -381. Refund <br />report is a summary sheet which lists data from each refund request form, <br />along with the justification for the refunds to the taxpayers in accordance <br />with N.C.G.S. 105 -381. <br />Note: Due to the transition of motor vehicles onto the new North <br />Carolina Vehicle Tax System (NCVTS), motor vehicle- related refunds and <br />releases will begin to be displayed on the new report generated by NCVTS. <br />UPON MOTION of Commissioner Shue, seconded by Commissioner Honeycutt <br />and unanimously carried, the Board approved the November 2014 Refund - Release <br />report, along with the NCVTS Refund Report, as submitted and granted <br />authority to the Tax Collector to process the refunds and releases. The <br />report is hereby incorporated into the minutes by reference and is on file <br />with the Clerk to the Board. <br />G) NEW BUSINESS <br />(G -1) Infrastructure and Asset Management - Property Exchange Related to <br />Wallace Park <br />Jonathan Marshall, Infrastructure and Asset Management Director, <br />presented a request for a property exchange related to Wallace Park and <br />reviewed the following memorandum regarding the proposed transaction. <br />Staff discussed with the previous Board of Commissioners the need <br />to obtain property for an alternative access to the Wallace Park <br />property. The acquisition would provide an access that did not <br />require a rail crossing and, after exchange of property, allow <br />part of the existing property to be marketed for private non- <br />residential development. Robert and Donna Wallace have acquired <br />a parcel on Bethel School Road for the purpose of exchange and to <br />provide the new access. <br />The properties to be exchanged are not of equal value, but a <br />value for each must be determined for the exchange documents to <br />be prepared. The County owned property at the corner of Wallace <br />Road and US 601 on the south side of the railroad is the parcel <br />planned to be transferred to the Wallaces. That parcel was <br />appraised by Integra Realty Resources and was previously proposed <br />for sale to a private party for non - residential development. The <br />Market Value Analysis from the appraisal was used as the sales <br />price for the parcel in that proposed transaction. Consistent <br />with that proposal, the value based on the Market Value Analysis <br />is $780,000. <br />The Wallaces acquired a parcel on Bethel School Road and have <br />submitted records and information on the costs of acquisition and <br />some property improvements that were performed. The acquisition <br />costs include the sales price, survey costs, legal costs and <br />other due diligence that total $231,796.50. Wallace Construction <br />also performed work on the property once it was acquired that <br />included, among other things, proper disposal of a demolished <br />house and mobile home that were buried on the property, <br />improvements and stabilization of a dam, general clean up, dead <br />tree removal and some basic grading. That work totaled <br />$38,787.26 and was all work the County would had to have done at <br />some point before the property could be used. The total value <br />for the parcel they propose to exchange is $270,583.76 which is <br />less than the tax value for the property of $290,410.00. <br />The difference in values of property being exchanged is proposed <br />to be used to reduce the total sales price included in the <br />Installment Purchase Agreement. That difference is $509,41.6.24. <br />In addition, the original Installment Purchase Agreement included <br />