Laserfiche WebLink
December 3, 2012 (Recessed Meeting) Page 1326 <br />White: But they're not willing to stake that based upon this new information <br />that everything is up to snuff. They're saying that based on the information <br />that was provided and what they wrote the bond on - they're going on that <br />information. And they're keeping the bond under that information. <br />Burrage: But then again - <br />Small: I don't think that's what he's saying at all. <br />Cash: No. <br />Small: He's saying with all of the information they have verbally agreed to <br />keep the bond. <br />Cash: That's correct. Because I disclosed to her what - what, what the <br />board wanted and if there were issues with professional licensing. And she <br />said, no there weren't, that the bond is issued and the bond is fine. But <br />they wouldn't - <br />Small: Just wouldn't put that in writing. <br />Cash: They wouldn't put that in writing. <br />White: So you're comfortable that they're not going to go off the bond, <br />they're not going to revoke the bond - <br />Cash: I am. That's what she assured me. <br />White: No matter what happens, they're not going to revoke the bond or <br />anything? Is that correct? <br />Cash: That - that's what she assured me, yes. <br />Burrage: Well any bonding company can revoke the bond, can't they? Without a <br />reason? <br />Cash: They can. I'm not - she told me that the bond is fine. <br />Burrage: I mean insurance - the county insurance company can go bankrupt <br />tomorrow and all our bonds be bad, right? <br />Cash: That's right. <br />Measmer: It's still very concerning to me that they won't put anything in <br />writing. And if that is their policy - I understand - however, you know, <br />this contact that you have, that you just spoke with she could not be there <br />next week and a problem could arise and we could say well we had information, <br />we spoke to so- and -so and everything was fine that day. <br />Cash: Well when - when you look at the application that I submitted here, it <br />says... you know the only thing that even comes up to this at all is `Have you <br />ever had a bond declined, cancelled or renewal refused ? ". <br />Measmer: I see. <br />Cash: And - and we checked the box "yes" and said Penn National would not <br />disclose to the applicant the reason - and she didn't even, there weren't <br />questions asked about this when I was on the phone - and I volunteered the <br />information that there was a suspension of a professional license. Would <br />that impact the bond at all? And she said "No." And I said can you fax me a <br />statement saying that and she said that's not something we can do, we've done <br />our due diligence on this bond issue. <br />Burrage: Could they not have went back and asked Penn, asked them why they <br />turned the bond down? <br />Cash: I don't know that. <br />Burrage: I said could they have. They could have, though. <br />Cash: I would assume they have - you know, on the application there is a <br />social security number - and again to your point, it's public record. So it's <br />up to the bonding company to go on the information that we provide them to do <br />their due diligence, to figure out if they want to issue a bond. And I'm not <br />an underwriter, I mean I don't, but that's what they do. <br />Poole: Okay, we do have a motion on the table, which Commissioner White made <br />and it was seconded - which is to deny the bond, is that correct? <br />White: It is correct, Madam Chairman. <br />Poole: Any other comments or questions? And because the clerk needs to know <br />very specifically - correctly - exactly how each commissioner is voting, all <br />those in favor of the motion to deny the bond, please raise your hand. <br />(Chairman Poole and Commissioners White, Carruth and Measmer raised their <br />hands to vote in favor of the motion to deny the bond.) <br />Poole: All those opposed, please raise your hand. <br />(Vice Chairman Burrage raised his hand in opposition of the motion to deny <br />the bond.) <br />(The MOTION carried, with Chairman Poole and Commissioners White, Carruth and <br />Measmer voting for and Commissioner Burrage voting against.) <br />Poole: Okay, at this time the bond has been denied at a vote of four to one. <br />Our attorney, I need to ask you what we do next, based on the law... And I <br />guess, do we - have it in open. <br />Koch: Well, in order for someone to be sworn into the office of register of <br />deeds or to continue in the office of register of deeds, that person has to <br />have a bond, required by statute. Now we've discussed that previously, if <br />the person has no bond, then it brings into play NCGS 58 -72 -25 which the - <br />allows the commission to declare the office vacant if there is no bond. And <br />it's a short statute, let me just read it: "...from the failure of any such <br />officer to make such renewal of his bond, it is the duty of the board of <br />commissioners, by an order to be entered of record, to declare his office <br />vacant, and proceed forthwith to appointed successor, if the power of filling <br />the vacancy in the particular case is vested in the board of commissioners; <br />