Laserfiche WebLink
February 7, 2011 (Work Session) Page 305 <br />UPON MOTION of Vice Chairman Poole, seconded by Commissioner Burrage <br />and unanimously carried, the Board voted to place approval of Grant for <br />Permanent Greenway and Sanitary Sewer Easements for PIN #'s 5620 -21 -1889 and <br />5620 -22 -9833 on the February 21, 2011 Agenda as a Consent item. <br />BOC - Development of 2011 Legislative Goals <br />John Day, County Manager, reported a number of legislative items were <br />submitted at the Board's Retreat (Jan. 28 -29, 2011), but not discussed due to <br />time constraints. In addition, he reported the Mt. Pleasant Town <br />Administrator submitted a request to change the NC Rural Center's criteria to <br />match the USDA Rural Development's criteria (specifically, remove the <br />prohibition against aid to municipalities in Tier 3 counties) for <br />grant purposes. Finally, he advised the North Carolina Association of County <br />Commissioners (NCACC) adopted its legislative goals for 2011 -2012, and noted <br />that Commissioner Measmer is the Board's representative on that topic. <br />The items from the retreat are as follows: <br />• Amend NCGS 14 -399 to allow regulation of delivery of unsolicited <br />telephone books. <br />• Reinstate sales tax exemption for public schools. <br />• Payment in lieu of taxes. <br />• Address unfunded mandates. <br />• End local government incentives. <br />At the request of Chairman White, Richard Koch, County Attorney, <br />reviewed NCGS 14- 399.1, the anti - litter statute, and advised the regulation <br />of delivery of unsolicited telephone books would depend on the definition of <br />litter and if the phone book category would fit within the exceptions <br />contained in the statute. <br />A lengthy discussion ensued. The following issues were addressed: <br />telephone books; reinstating the sales tax exemption for public schools; <br />payment in lieu of taxes for nonprofits; school classroom sizes; possible <br />unfunded mandates from the State for jails (inmates may stay longer), schools <br />(classroom sizes may increase), etc.; according to the Legislature, counties <br />have the ability to raise property taxes to pay for State mandates; etc. <br />After further discussion, Chairman White suggested any unfunded State <br />or Federal mandates that require additional expense to the County, be <br />identified by staff, voted on by the Board and disclosed to the public. <br />Mr. Day suggested the financial impact and corresponding affect on the <br />tax rate be requested for each new bill for all counties and published in <br />every newspaper across the State to help make a point that is consistent with <br />the perceptions in Raleigh. Further, he commented that having a menu of <br />revenue options for all counties to choose from would be helpful and is an <br />annual issue of the NCACC. <br />Discussion continued. Issues addressed included: secondary road <br />construction; using the Golden Leaf Fund (money from the tobacco trust fund <br />settlement) to balance the State budget; local government incentives; etc. <br />John Cox, with the Cabarrus Regional Chamber of Commerce, also participated <br />in the discussion. <br />Following discussion, the Board agreed on the following items: <br />• Amend NCGS 14 -399 to allow regulation of delivery of unsolicited <br />telephone books. <br />• Reinstate sales tax exemption for public schools. <br />• Study the impact to local government finances of exempting <br />nonprofits from the requirement of paying property taxes and review <br />possible payment in lieu of taxes requirements. <br />• Address unfunded mandates (DSS, Schools, Jail, etc.) by providing <br />additional funding, or additional funding sources. <br />• Review the use of local government incentives in business <br />recruitment, in particular, the practice of local governments <br />bidding against each other for projects. <br />• Change NC Rural Center's grant /loan award criteria to more closely <br />match the USDA Rural Development aid requirements (specifically, <br />remove the prohibition against aid to municipalities in Tier 3 <br />counties). <br />