|
September 6, 2011 (Work Session)
<br />Page 583
<br />Adequacy Determination
<br />As illustrated above, adequate school capacity at the middle
<br />school does not exist currently for this apartment project, nor
<br />does it exist at the two year and five year review levels. (Note
<br />that according to Section 15 -11, Number 4, of the APFO, "...future
<br />available capacity must be "...equal to or greater than the
<br />projected enrollment that will be produced by the proposed
<br />development for all school types," not just one or two.)
<br />Is the project subject to Chapter 15, Adequate Public Facilities?
<br />Yes.
<br />Board of Commissioner Action Options:
<br />Option #1
<br />Consider exception or application of APFO to this project.
<br />Option #2
<br />Approve the Reservation of Capacity with the conditions outlined
<br />below:
<br />1. The project is subject to a phasing schedule.
<br />In calendar year 2011, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued;
<br />In calendar year 2012, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued;
<br />In calendar year 2013, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued;
<br />In calendar year 2014, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued;
<br />In calendar year 2015, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued;
<br />In calendar year 2016, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued.
<br />5 multi - family
<br />11 multi - family
<br />11 multi- family
<br />11 multi - family
<br />11 multi - family
<br />17 multi - family
<br />2. Mitigation of the pro -rata share of the cost of the planned
<br />capacity, which equals $3,678.00 per multi - family residential
<br />apartment unit, payable prior to the issuance of building
<br />permitting.
<br />Option #3
<br />Consider alternate approval determined by the Board of
<br />Commissioners
<br />Ms. Morris stated the project is age restricted, however no supporting
<br />documentation was provided. She recommended the Board of Commissioners
<br />consider Option No. 1, exemption to the APFO, contingent upon the County
<br />Attorney's receipt of supporting documentation pertaining to age exempt
<br />projects. Option No. 2 was recommended should the documentation not be
<br />provided or not be satisfactory to the County Attorney.
<br />Board.
<br />Richard M. Koch, County Attorney, responded to questions from the
<br />UPON MOTION of Vice Chairman Poole, seconded by Commissioner Carruth
<br />and unanimously carried, the Board voted to place the "Reservation of
<br />Capacity Certificate for Brook Point Manor" on the September 19, 2011 Agenda
<br />as a Consent item, with Option No. 1, exemption from the APFO (Adequate
<br />Public Facilities Ordinance) provided supporting documentation is provided to
<br />Current
<br />Available
<br />Available
<br />Available',
<br />Capacity
<br />Capacity
<br />Capacity
<br />Including
<br />Including
<br />Including
<br />Students
<br />Students
<br />Students
<br />Current
<br />Generated
<br />Planned
<br />Generated
<br />Planned
<br />Generated
<br />Available
<br />by
<br />Capacity
<br />by
<br />Capacity
<br />by
<br />School
<br />Capacity
<br />Project
<br />2 Yrs
<br />Project
<br />5 Yrs
<br />Project
<br />Winecoff
<br />42
<br />32
<br />42
<br />32
<br />42
<br />32
<br />Elementary
<br />Northwest
<br />Middle
<br />-241
<br />-245
<br />-241
<br />-245
<br />-241
<br />-245
<br />School
<br />Northwest
<br />High School
<br />301
<br />296
<br />301
<br />296
<br />301
<br />296
<br />Adequacy Determination
<br />As illustrated above, adequate school capacity at the middle
<br />school does not exist currently for this apartment project, nor
<br />does it exist at the two year and five year review levels. (Note
<br />that according to Section 15 -11, Number 4, of the APFO, "...future
<br />available capacity must be "...equal to or greater than the
<br />projected enrollment that will be produced by the proposed
<br />development for all school types," not just one or two.)
<br />Is the project subject to Chapter 15, Adequate Public Facilities?
<br />Yes.
<br />Board of Commissioner Action Options:
<br />Option #1
<br />Consider exception or application of APFO to this project.
<br />Option #2
<br />Approve the Reservation of Capacity with the conditions outlined
<br />below:
<br />1. The project is subject to a phasing schedule.
<br />In calendar year 2011, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued;
<br />In calendar year 2012, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued;
<br />In calendar year 2013, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued;
<br />In calendar year 2014, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued;
<br />In calendar year 2015, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued;
<br />In calendar year 2016, no more than
<br />apartment unit permits issued.
<br />5 multi - family
<br />11 multi - family
<br />11 multi- family
<br />11 multi - family
<br />11 multi - family
<br />17 multi - family
<br />2. Mitigation of the pro -rata share of the cost of the planned
<br />capacity, which equals $3,678.00 per multi - family residential
<br />apartment unit, payable prior to the issuance of building
<br />permitting.
<br />Option #3
<br />Consider alternate approval determined by the Board of
<br />Commissioners
<br />Ms. Morris stated the project is age restricted, however no supporting
<br />documentation was provided. She recommended the Board of Commissioners
<br />consider Option No. 1, exemption to the APFO, contingent upon the County
<br />Attorney's receipt of supporting documentation pertaining to age exempt
<br />projects. Option No. 2 was recommended should the documentation not be
<br />provided or not be satisfactory to the County Attorney.
<br />Board.
<br />Richard M. Koch, County Attorney, responded to questions from the
<br />UPON MOTION of Vice Chairman Poole, seconded by Commissioner Carruth
<br />and unanimously carried, the Board voted to place the "Reservation of
<br />Capacity Certificate for Brook Point Manor" on the September 19, 2011 Agenda
<br />as a Consent item, with Option No. 1, exemption from the APFO (Adequate
<br />Public Facilities Ordinance) provided supporting documentation is provided to
<br />
|