Laserfiche WebLink
July 6, 2009 (Work Session) Page 1480 <br />Board would not be affected by withdrawal of membership from the COG because <br />that program is grant funded by the State. A general discussion ensued. <br />Commissioner Poole noted that Stanly County has voted to rejoin the <br />Centralina COG. She also stated her preference to continue the County's <br />membership in the COG until the efforts of the COG's Blue Ribbon Committee <br />are complete. <br />Chairman White stated his preference to end the County's membership in <br />the COG, noting the lack of regionalism during the COG's Highway 3 study. He <br />also suggested if the Board chooses to remain members of the COG, then <br />continue at a reduced rate. <br />Commissioner Carruth suggested the County remain a member of the COG <br />for now, and review the membership again in December 2009. He also suggested <br />a letter be sent to the COG to let them know that the County will be <br />reviewing this issue again in December. <br />UPON MOTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Commissioner Carruth <br />and unanimously carried, the Board voted to table the discussion regarding <br />Centralina Council of Government (COG) Membership until the December 7, 2009 <br />Work Session. <br />Between Cabarrus <br />Centralina Council of Governments for Purchase of Condominium for Office <br />John Day, County Manager, presented information related to a request <br />from the Centralina Council of Governments for approval of an Interlocal <br />Agreement between Cabarrus County (et al.) and Centralina Council of <br />Governments for the purchase of a condominium for office space. <br />UPON MOTION of Commissioner Carruth, seconded by Vice Chairman Mynatt <br />and unanimously carried, the Board voted to place denial of the Interlocal <br />Agreement between Cabarrus County (et al.) and the Centralina Council of <br />Governments for purchase of a condominium for office space on the July 20, <br />2009 Agenda as a Consent item. <br />Sohn Day, County Manager, presented information related to the status <br />of the proposed new building for the Cabarrus Health Alliance (CHA). He <br />addressed the following issues: there was a newspaper story in the Salisbury <br />Post about some discussion the Kannapolis City Council had about the <br />possibility of, through some type of financing, to build the new building for <br />the Cabarrus Health Alliance (CHA) ; the new building for the CHA is one of <br />the projects agreed on between Cabarrus County and the City of Kannapolis to <br />be funded by the proceeds from TIF bonds; the CHA began the design process <br />last year, has spent approximately half a million dollars on both design and <br />the condemnation of property; there is still approximately $2 million more <br />funding needed for the property that has been condemned; CHA has received <br />bids for the project that expire August 2009; the received bids were below <br />projections; Chairman White, and Mr. Day met with Dr. Fred Pilkington and the <br />Chairman of the Health Alliance Board to discuss this issue and were <br />encouraged to bring this up with the Board of Commissioners to discuss debt <br />financing for the construction for the new building; in discussions with the <br />Kannapolis City Manager, Kannapolis is not interested in the CHA building <br />alone but would also want to borrow an additional sum of money for some of <br />the infrastructure improvements that it has planned or performed already; the <br />city manager suggested if the Board of Commissioners is willing to pledge all <br />the money being generated in the TIF at this point, they would be interested <br />in discussions; TIE bonds have not yet been sold; $15 million is needed for <br />the CHA new building; etc. <br />A lengthy discussion ensued. The following issues were addressed: <br />this is not something the County would be issuing any debt on; because it is <br />in the TIF district, it would be debt issued by Kannapolis; Kannapolis would <br />probably need to own the building in order to collateralize the debt <br />instrument; if the new CHA building is not built, there is more space <br />available at its current location; support of the Kannapolis proposal as long <br />as the County does not issue debt, the concept of the Interlocal Agreement is <br />not changed and that whenever the TIF bonds get issued, the $15 million is <br />taken off of the bond issuance; the County's obligation to the Interlocal <br />Agreement would probably not have any consideration by a bond rating agency, <br />