BC 2009 12 21 Regular - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

December 21, 2009 (Regular Meeting) Adequacy Determination As illustrated above, adequate school capacity does not exist for this multi-family project at the elementary and high schools. (Note that according to Section 15-11, Number 4, of the APFO, "...future available capacity must be "...equal to or greater than the projected enrollment that will be produced by the proposed development for all school types," not just one or two.) Is the project subject to Chapter 15, Adequate Public Facilities? Yes. Board of Commissioner Action Options: Option 1 Consider exception or application of APFO to this project. Option 2 Approve the Reservation of Capacity with the conditions outlined below: 1. The pr In apartment In apartment In apartment In apartment In apartment eject is subject to a p calendar year 2009, unit occupancy permits calendar year 2010, unit occupancy permits calendar year 2011, unit occupancy permits calendar year 2012, unit occupancy permits calendar year 2013, unit occupancy permits teasing schedule. no more than 1 multi-family issued; no more than 11 multi-family issued; no more than 11 multi-family issued; no more than 11 multi-family issued; no more than 10 multi-family issued. 2. Mitigation of the pro-rata share of the cost of the planned capacity, which equals $4,153.00 per multi-family residential apartment unit, payable prior to the issuance of building permitting. Option 3 Consider alternate approval determined by the Board of Commissioners Mr. Koch informed this request is similar to an age-restricted project (Villas at Forest Park) that the Board approved a year ago. He advised there have been two other projects of this nature in the county and the conditions proposed for the two prior instances are as follows: (1) restrictions are to be recorded that legally define the property as age restricted to persons over the age of 55; (2) if the County discovers a school-age child residing at the project, the developer or assignee is responsible for paying the voluntary mitigation payment in effect under the County's Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO); and (3) that the County has the right to monitor tenant activity by inspecting the property and reviewing tenant reports. He also informed the developer's representatives are in agreement with the aforementioned conditions. UPON MOTION of Commissioner Privette, seconded by Commissioner Mynatt and unanimously carried, the Board approved the Reservation of Capacity Certificate for the Villas at Logan Gardens and granted exemption from the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO), with the aforementioned conditions. (G-4) Commerce - Consent Agreement for the West Oaks Subdivision Project Jonathan Marshall, Commerce Director, highlighted the following information on the West Oaks Subdivision project and acknowledged this request is for a Consent Agreement based on the date of the preliminary plat approval by the City of Kannapolis under the County's pre-August 2007 Ordinance: The West Oaks subdivision was approved by the City of Kannapolis Technical Review Committee on September 23, 2008. The project consists of 13 single-family residential lots on +/- 11.125 acres located on South Oakmont Street in the City of Kannapolis, North Carolina. The specifics of the agreement are as follows: ^ Developer - Brandon Little & Stephen Wasserman, 4404 Lazy Drive, Charlotte, NC 28215.